Source Filmmaker

Source Filmmaker

Dicoguy Nov 16, 2016 @ 10:56pm
TGA rendering
If I render a poster as a vtf file, what are the advantages? I know you can open it up in GIMP, but will it still retain the quality of a PNG rendered poster? What are the other advantages to rendering as a tga?
Last edited by Dicoguy; Nov 17, 2016 @ 5:02pm
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Zappy Nov 16, 2016 @ 11:04pm 
Advantages: Works in the Source engine (but why'd you even want to use a poster in Source in the first place, and if you do, why not just manually convert it to VTF?).

Disadvantages: Stretched/squished image (as the width/height can only be 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, etcetera), lower quality compared to PNG (due to compression), and most image editors don't support it (some do, but only with plug-ins).
Last edited by Zappy; Nov 16, 2016 @ 11:04pm
Pte Jack Nov 16, 2016 @ 11:28pm 
I did not know that vtf was a render option... (???) If it is, Idon't have it and an export option! (lol)
Last edited by Pte Jack; Nov 16, 2016 @ 11:32pm
Dicoguy Nov 17, 2016 @ 4:34pm 
Originally posted by Pte Jack:
I did not know that vtf was a render option... (???) If it is, Idon't have it and an export option! (lol)

i mean it is the defualt render option...
Last edited by Dicoguy; Nov 17, 2016 @ 4:34pm
bryce tankthrust Nov 17, 2016 @ 5:01pm 
Originally posted by Dicoguy:
Originally posted by Pte Jack:
I did not know that vtf was a render option... (???) If it is, Idon't have it and an export option! (lol)

i mean it is the defualt render option...

wat? no it's not. The render options (if we're discussing posters) are .tga, png, and jpg.
Dicoguy Nov 17, 2016 @ 5:02pm 
Originally posted by its free real estate:
Originally posted by Dicoguy:

i mean it is the defualt render option...

wat? no it's not. The render options (if we're discussing posters) are .tga, png, and jpg.
ahh nuts I meant tga, my bad
bryce tankthrust Nov 17, 2016 @ 5:13pm 
Originally posted by Dicoguy:
Originally posted by its free real estate:

wat? no it's not. The render options (if we're discussing posters) are .tga, png, and jpg.
ahh nuts I meant tga, my bad

._.
Marco Skoll Nov 17, 2016 @ 5:44pm 
They're both lossless formats, so in terms of quality, there's no difference. The main thing to consider is that PNG tends to be supported by more programs.

There's a lot of technical differences in terms of how their compressions are optimised and what might have the smaller filesize if you want to compress a photo, or if you wanted to get the best performance out of a game texture... but that explanation would be a lot of jargon I don't entirely understand myself.

In the great scheme of things though, SFM's poster export seems to export uncompressed TGAs and PNGs, which makes for unnecessarily large file sizes.

I had a lot of them from back from when I actually made the mistake of using poster exports (buggy nasty mis-rendered things that they are) and I eventually ended up feeding them to a Photoshop batch process to compress the formats. (Which got me back a considerable number of gigabytes on my hard disk).
Last edited by Marco Skoll; Nov 17, 2016 @ 5:45pm
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Nov 16, 2016 @ 10:56pm
Posts: 7