Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's the right game, just the wrong devs. If they sold the franchise to someone more capable, while keeping the core mechanics, i'd give it a shot.
Right, i mean my tact is not to come into someones storefront to bad mouth them. There may be internal issues going on there or what not.
But the experience with these developers for me, on both console and pc, has not been a pleasant one, and i think its a shame, being the game def has its up points, and promise.
It's just i don't feel these devs, in my own personal opinion, to be very credible in my dealings with them. I don't why that is, but imo, it's just a shame is all.
IF they sold their franchise, then you can be sure that the next dev want to put their identity into the game and they would surely abandon everything that made Chivalry good.
Mordhau's unpopularity combined with Bannerlord being terrible has put the medieval slasher genre in an evolutionary dead end. Where exactly can Chivalry go after beating its competitors and remaining unchallenged for 2+ years?
Personally, the issue i have with Mordhau, and a big one is that toggle block mechanism. As i said, if Chivalry just had better developers, nobody would stop them. It's the developers themselves hindering the game, not the game itself.