This game is not more impressive than Arkham Knight

[Razin_Shah]

Graphics, Combat, Sound effects and Music is superior in Arkham Knight.
This game does have better performance though but that's the only thing it has over Arkham Knight.

[Bortedet]

Eventhough I agree it's the worst in the trilogy, I find Arkham Knight to be a better game than Spider-Man. But it has both bigger pros and bigger cons than Spidey so depending on how important each of those are to you, specifically, makes the entire debate very subjective. Yes it has no boss battles and basically too many tank fights, it has a plot twist you can see coming from light years away, it has the worst PC port I have ever seen but it also let's you use the frickin Batmobile(that has better driving mechanics than even some racing games) , has way better main and side mission design, much much better stealth gameplay and despite the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ plot twist has more memorable moments in its main story. The way they integrated the Joker into the story is also brilliant. Spider-Man's story is pretty basic compared to the majority of Akrham Knight's plot.

If we are comparing combat though, I would again say Arkham Knight's is better because Spider-Man's combat mostly boils down to Web Bomb+Concussion Blast combo after you unlock both. Also not every enemy gives you enough time to dodge their moves in a crowd. There are situations in Spider-Man where you simply can not avoid being gang banged which is weird because Spidey is supposed to be wayyyy faster than Bats. He needs to be untouchable basically. This gets better as you unlock more moves but some of those moves seem like they're just there to band aid this, they don't really fix the underlying problem. But I like the fact that it's not just a copy of Arkham system like Mad Max and Shadow of Mordor; it actually iterates. You are way more mobile as Spider-Man and and using that mobility in combat does not reset your combo meter. You can air dodge and even swing during a fight which I like a lot. Spider-Man's combat has verticality which is non-existent in Arkham Games. It is also way more improvisational which is fitting for a Spider-Man game. I think Spider-Man's combat has the potential to match or even surpass Flawless Freeflow in future games.

[Vex]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von BoonMeIfYouCan:

Arkham is far superior and idk why anyone would spend £50 on this.

Mean while it says you own the game?

[loganjamesalex]

I love the Arkham games to bits but Batman's cap glide has nothing on Spider-Man's webswing

[Shook Ones]

The only thing that Arkham Knight impressed more than Spider-Man was its terrible port. =))

[The Goopie]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mongjin:

I'd rather tons of pedestrians. I like the Arkham games but the fact they came up with some lame excuse to exclude pedestrians was lazy. The city in the last two games feel completely dead and empty. It doesn't feel like a living breathing world, feels more like a toy box.

Have you even touched a batman game? no wonder you have kpop/asian ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ as profile pictures, literally one of the gimmicks of batman is being insulted by the thugs that take the place of the pedestrians

[DraX]

I like both so there's that.

[TuSwab]

Imagine comparing a batman game to a spider-man game. Both are good and from two different universes

[Wehzy]

If you think its not more impressive, then your PC is potato and can't even run highest graphics.

l m a o .

[soso]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von DaxNovu:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mongjin:

I'd rather tons of pedestrians. I like the Arkham games but the fact they came up with some lame excuse to exclude pedestrians was lazy. The city in the last two games feel completely dead and empty. It doesn't feel like a living breathing world, feels more like a toy box.

Have you even touched a batman game? no wonder you have kpop/asian ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ as profile pictures, literally one of the gimmicks of batman is being insulted by the thugs that take the place of the pedestrians

Ok DC fanboy, wipe the cheeto dust off your fingers before you type next time.

[merk]

nice dumb comment you got there cope harder.

[soso]

Also Darkseid sucks. He's a ripoff of Thanos. Thanos is way cooler and stronger.

[bogn11]

spider man is a bit more dynamic, and the city is way more life like, more things goiing around. I loved AK but it felt empty overall

[The Goopie]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mongjin:

Also Darkseid sucks. He's a ripoff of Thanos. Thanos is way cooler and stronger.

Smartest Marvel fan that has ever surfaced this earth,

Darkseid first apperance Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen #134

(November 1970)

Thanos first apperance Iron Man #55

31 October 1972

[bogn11]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von DaxNovu:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mongjin:

Also Darkseid sucks. He's a ripoff of Thanos. Thanos is way cooler and stronger.

Smartest Marvel fan that has ever surfaced this earth,

Darkseid first apperance Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen #134

(November 1970)

Thanos first apperance Iron Man #55

31 October 1972

loll ouch!

[The Phasmid]

I think both have different strengths. I personally prefer Spider-Man's story. The characters are more grounded, and you feel the stakes. Spider-Man is better as a cinematic gaming experience. Arkham Knight definitely has better graphical fidelity, varied gameplay mechanics, and still the best combat system of any game. Also, the side missions are better.