make the game free

[jame]

i like the game but i dont think id pay to play it for $40 too

[SirCee ツ]

You're wrong

[SirCee ツ]

£30 is very reasonable, i don't really know what you're expecting for a game of this quality, at least at a premium price they wont end up having to over monetise it just to keep it going and it means it's less likely that it will be filled with hackers as there's a monetary barrier for entry.

if you can't put £30 aside for a game then what are you playing when most are waaaaaay more expensive than this.

[jame]

Oprindeligt skrevet af SirCee ツ:

£30 is very reasonable, i don't really know what you're expecting for a game of this quality, at least at a premium price they wont end up having to over monetise it just to keep it going and it means it's less likely that it will be filled with hackers as there's a monetary barrier for entry.

if you can't put £30 aside for a game then what are you playing when most are waaaaaay more expensive than this.

i just dont see much replayability after awhile. even if they do wipes, theres not much objective.

[Scrubdaddy]

Unless I'm wrong I swear I heard the game would be free to play, if it isn't I agree at its current state it's a long way to go before I drop cash on it, even with it being a great alpha test

[jame]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Scrubdaddy:

Unless I'm wrong I swear I heard the game would be free to play, if it isn't I agree at its current state it's a long way to go before I drop cash on it, even with it being a great alpha test

it was originally ftp then they announced that it would be paid to play

[jame]

"Today, we announced that ARC Raiders will be released as a $40 premium title." even worse lol $30 was reasonable. $40 is not.

[slanecek]

Make it $69, $40 is too cheap.

[:D]

id pay 100 dollars for a decent extraction shooter

[STW_ghost081095]

hackers should pay for the ban!

[AngryPixel]

Oprindeligt skrevet af :D:

id pay 100 dollars for a decent extraction shooter

Same but this is not one

[Scrubdaddy]

Oprindeligt skrevet af jame:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Scrubdaddy:

Unless I'm wrong I swear I heard the game would be free to play, if it isn't I agree at its current state it's a long way to go before I drop cash on it, even with it being a great alpha test

it was originally ftp then they announced that it would be paid to play

Meh I'm not too happy about that, they have a lot of work to do to make this worth 40 bucks now

[:D]

Oprindeligt skrevet af AngryPixel:

Oprindeligt skrevet af :D:

id pay 100 dollars for a decent extraction shooter

Same but this is not one

Shut up man youre one of the losers crying about no pve

[AngryPixel]

Oprindeligt skrevet af :D:

Oprindeligt skrevet af AngryPixel:

Same but this is not one

Shut up man youre one of the losers crying about no pve

Shut up little man, i am crying about the most soulless and repetitive gameplay i have ever seen. 830hours in Hunt: Shuwdown, 700h in pubg, 1700 in cs:go. No real pve elements is the smallest problem.

[SirCee ツ]

Oprindeligt skrevet af AngryPixel:

Oprindeligt skrevet af :D:

Shut up man youre one of the losers crying about no pve

Shut up little man, i am crying about the most soulless and repetitive gameplay i have ever seen. 830hours in Hunt: Shuwdown, 700h in pubg, 1700 in cs:go. No real pve elements is the smallest problem.

What is it in particular you don't like?

[Scrubdaddy]

Oprindeligt skrevet af AngryPixel:

Oprindeligt skrevet af :D:

Shut up man youre one of the losers crying about no pve

Shut up little man, i am crying about the most soulless and repetitive gameplay i have ever seen. 830hours in Hunt: Shuwdown, 700h in pubg, 1700 in cs:go. No real pve elements is the smallest problem.

Its in alpha, give the devs time to cook, you have so many hours in Hunt, you should remember how ♥♥♥♥ that game was way back at this stage in its development, this game has legs