Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Survivor has more to do, more interesting level design, combat seems unfair at times for the sake of a challenge. Still really good.
The platforming is obnoxious though. Fallen Order was a good balance of reasonable platforming mixed in with combat and exploration. Survivor is just dumb at times with the ridiculous platforming.
Combat is a bit better and exploration is also a tad better. Other than that it feels the same.
Felt more of a powerful jedi in Fallen Order
Other than that, they look like very similar games, though from the style perspective there's something I like better about the Fallen Order planets. I really enjoyed Dathomir, Kashyk, etc. Here the planets look a little plain.
100%
Also again I have had better than 30 FPS on ultra at launch, and now am at 60 most of the time.