Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah, I'm sure digital foundry is wrong about all of these games.
60hrs played pretty much 100% and only 1 crash. So yeah it does actually does run well for a lot of people. This is one of the problems with review bombing.
And your claim holds more weight than actual professionals with real analytics and video proof?
Crashing is the only thing you'd consider to be "not well"?
Your edit is 100% suss.
So you don't care about frame rate, frame time consistency, judder, or screen tearing.
So standards have significantly dropped in consumers, I guess I got my answer, thanks.
That is fair, but I'm referring to this game being on top of the steam sales charts.
What might you be referring to here, kind sir?
I'm not looking for a fight, you've answered my topic's question. Topic closed.