RX6600 Ryzen 5 3600x Will it run 1080p?

[Parturikusi]

I have my ryzen 5 overclocked to 4.1hz
So hoping somebody could tell if it will run smoot 60fps with 1080p.

[CJM]

Nobody, and I mean nobody is getting a smooth 60 FPS. There are numerous sections in the game that cannot get above 30 FPS, and in the open areas nobody is getting 60.

That said, my RX 6600M does quite well for itself. When the frame rate plummets, I generally just enable Ray Tracing, because why not at that point.

10 hours in (on the EA App), and no crashes.

Probably best to limit the frame rate to 30 FPS or 40 FPS in the AMD Adrenaline software, and enable Ray Tracing and enjoy a near PlayStation 5 like experience.

[skitzbuckethatz]

Originally posted by CJM:

Nobody, and I mean nobody is getting a smooth 60 FPS. There are numerous sections in the game that cannot get above 30 FPS, and in the open areas nobody is getting 60.

That said, my RX 6600M does quite well for itself. When the frame rate plummets, I generally just enable Ray Tracing, because why not at that point.

10 hours in (on the EA App), and no crashes.

Probably best to limit the frame rate to 30 FPS or 40 FPS in the AMD Adrenaline software, and enable Ray Tracing and enjoy a near PlayStation 5 like experience.

This is flat out wrong. I have Ryzen 5 3600 and a 3060 and in the town in Koboh I get the worst framerate, around 50. Every other area in the game is between 60 and 100fps.

RT off, every graphics setting on high/epic. I have 30 hours in game now, most of that has been running brilliantly.

[AmaiAmai]

6650XT : note there are performance differences as you can see here between a 6650XT and 6600, that means you will likely get less performance than below.

Keep in mind this is @ 2560x1080, but also that the 6650XT is not the 6600. The 6650XT has more cores on the GPU and can pull more power, though that is unlikely to matter as much as whether you have SAM on in Adrenalin. Your CPU may also mean less performance than what you see here:

View at your own risk of spoilers!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lSJubUgZL4

It's important to note that others with similar hardware cannot run the game or get less performance because system configuration also appears to cause issues in this game That means there is a real possibility you may not actually be able to run this game or suffer worse performance for reasons other than hardware specs.

Footage in Win 10: FSR[Q] : AMD SAM ON : GPU ISOLATION ENFORCED : Latest AMD Driver, stock client

[cobber888]

no to smooth fps, there are some areas the will feel decent and some areas dog ppoop, if you can handle drops to 40 then id say play otherwise it can get quite annoying. youre hardware should be able to play 60fps theoretically but the game isnt optimised.

[CJM]

Originally posted by skitzbuckethatz:

This is flat out wrong. I have Ryzen 5 3600 and a 3060 and in the town in Koboh I get the worst framerate, around 50. Every other area in the game is between 60 and 100fps.

RT off, every graphics setting on high/epic. I have 30 hours in game now, most of that has been running brilliantly.

A fair portion of it runs well enough I suppose. I guess it is the town on Koboh rather than the open areas that is tanking the frame rate. Do you get 50 FPS on the moon?

I reckon you are on a DDR5, PCI-Express 4.0 system.

AMD's website reports that the Ryzen 5 3600x was built to be paired with DDR4. Though, it does list PCI-Express 4.0 support. Which begs the question as to what is more important for getting that 50 FPS on Koboh, PCIe bandwidth, or RAM bandwidth?

With my RX 6600, I got 20-30 FPS on Coruscant, 40 FPS in the town on Koboh, and 30-40 FPS on Koboh's moon.

[Parturikusi]

Originally posted by AmaiAmai:

6650XT : note there are performance differences as you can see here between a 6650XT and 6600, that means you will likely get less performance than below.

Keep in mind this is @ 2560x1080, but also that the 6650XT is not the 6600. The 6650XT has more cores on the GPU and can pull more power, though that is unlikely to matter as much as whether you have SAM on in Adrenalin. Your CPU may also mean less performance than what you see here:

View at your own risk of spoilers!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lSJubUgZL4

It's important to note that others with similar hardware cannot run the game or get less performance because system configuration also appears to cause issues in this game That means there is a real possibility you may not actually be able to run this game or suffer worse performance for reasons other than hardware specs.

Footage in Win 10: FSR[Q] : AMD SAM ON : GPU ISOLATION ENFORCED : Latest AMD Driver, stock client

My SAM is not working or i cant turn it on because bios do you guys see a big difference with SAM of and on?

[DarkWaterSong]

I have the same thing, and it works great on my undervolted rig. It runs at right around 60 FPS on ultra at 1080,

[Parturikusi]

I will maybe buy the game just sucks that people with same rigs have so variable performance. Its going to be hastle to get amd driver settings and game settings right.

[AmaiAmai]

Originally posted by Hymppäne:

My SAM is not working or i cant turn it on because bios do you guys see a big difference with SAM of and on?

Strange, the Ryzen 3600 should have SAM support. Did you check your motherboard vendor and see if they have an update that enables it?

Without SAM you will be limited by your PCI bus speed. The game can and does move 2-4GB of assets at once in VRAM so without SAM or ReBAR you will likely get very bad performance when texture load or unload.

Even with it on, performance is lost to some extent either because of the game's code or because the 128bit bus is limiting. Considering it doesn't happen on other games and there is the same issue on much stronger GPUs with bigger buses and VRAM, I'd say it's the game's code at fault. Either way no SAM could mean way worse performance.

[CJM]

Originally posted by Hymppäne:

I will maybe buy the game just sucks that people with same rigs have so variable performance. Its going to be hastle to get amd driver settings and game settings right.

Not really, game is mostly CPU bound. Very rarely will your GPU actually struggle in this game.

Lower Draw Distance on Koboh, turn off Ray Tracing, and cap your frames to 40 or 50 FPS to minimize that "stuttery" feel.

[Parturikusi]

Originally posted by AmaiAmai:

Originally posted by Hymppäne:

My SAM is not working or i cant turn it on because bios do you guys see a big difference with SAM of and on?

Strange, the Ryzen 3600 should have SAM support. Did you check your motherboard vendor and see if they have an update that enables it?

Without SAM you will be limited by your PCI bus speed. The game can and does move 2-4GB of assets at once in VRAM so without SAM or ReBAR you will likely get very bad performance when texture load or unload.

Even with it on, performance is lost to some extent either because of the game's code or because the 128bit bus is limiting. Considering it doesn't happen on other games and there is the same issue on much stronger GPUs with bigger buses and VRAM, I'd say it's the game's code at fault. Either way no SAM could mean way worse performance.

Have to look up something how to get sam working thanks for the help.
In the past I had issues with wimdows safe mode and sam it jad to be turned of but my system would not boot up have to try get sam working first. (It also could be my motherboard have not thinked of that) Sorry for my bad english :D

[AmaiAmai]

Originally posted by Hymppäne:

Originally posted by AmaiAmai:

Strange, the Ryzen 3600 should have SAM support. Did you check your motherboard vendor and see if they have an update that enables it?

Without SAM you will be limited by your PCI bus speed. The game can and does move 2-4GB of assets at once in VRAM so without SAM or ReBAR you will likely get very bad performance when texture load or unload.

Even with it on, performance is lost to some extent either because of the game's code or because the 128bit bus is limiting. Considering it doesn't happen on other games and there is the same issue on much stronger GPUs with bigger buses and VRAM, I'd say it's the game's code at fault. Either way no SAM could mean way worse performance.

Have to look up something how to get sam working thanks for the help.
In the past I had issues with wimdows safe mode and sam it jad to be turned of but my system would not boot up have to try get sam working first. (It also could be my motherboard have not thinked of that) Sorry for my bad english :D

If you turn SAM on in BIOS make sure you are running Windows 10 or 11. I do not think Windows 7, 8, or lower have support for it.

You can see here how to do it:

https://www.windowscentral.com/how-smart-access-memory

If you don't have it there, what board do you have? Most AM4 boards should support it even if they use PCI 3. All PCI 4 ones do.

[Parturikusi]

Originally posted by AmaiAmai:

Originally posted by Hymppäne:

Have to look up something how to get sam working thanks for the help.
In the past I had issues with wimdows safe mode and sam it jad to be turned of but my system would not boot up have to try get sam working first. (It also could be my motherboard have not thinked of that) Sorry for my bad english :D

If you turn SAM on in BIOS make sure you are running Windows 10 or 11. I do not think Windows 7, 8, or lower have support for it.

You can see here how to do it:

https://www.windowscentral.com/how-smart-access-memory

If you don't have it there, what board do you have? Most AM4 boards should support it even if they use PCI 3. All PCI 4 ones do.

I will look in to that when I get home from work thanks. My motherboard was some tuf gaming budget board (450 or something like that)cant remember I am not a huge pc nerd :D.

[skitzbuckethatz]

Originally posted by CJM:

Originally posted by skitzbuckethatz:

This is flat out wrong. I have Ryzen 5 3600 and a 3060 and in the town in Koboh I get the worst framerate, around 50. Every other area in the game is between 60 and 100fps.

RT off, every graphics setting on high/epic. I have 30 hours in game now, most of that has been running brilliantly.

A fair portion of it runs well enough I suppose. I guess it is the town on Koboh rather than the open areas that is tanking the frame rate. Do you get 50 FPS on the moon?

I reckon you are on a DDR5, PCI-Express 4.0 system.

AMD's website reports that the Ryzen 5 3600x was built to be paired with DDR4. Though, it does list PCI-Express 4.0 support. Which begs the question as to what is more important for getting that 50 FPS on Koboh, PCIe bandwidth, or RAM bandwidth?

With my RX 6600, I got 20-30 FPS on Coruscant, 40 FPS in the town on Koboh, and 30-40 FPS on Koboh's moon.

16gb DDR4, PCIE 3.0. I have the game on an M.2 drive though.

The moon ran much better than the town on Koboh, but im not sure of the specific framerate. I havent been back to coruscant but the majority of Jedha and the Koboh outskirts ran very smoothly.

edit: I think the game just runs very differently for everyone. It is definitely not optimised well for PC and evidently it is a complete gamble as to if it will run well or not on varying systems.

[CJM]

Originally posted by skitzbuckethatz:

16gb DDR4, PCIE 3.0. I have the game on an M.2 drive though.

Same here, well I have 32GB of DDR4.

Originally posted by skitzbuckethatz:

The moon ran much better than the town on Koboh, but im not sure of the specific framerate. I havent been back to coruscant but the majority of Jedha and the Koboh outskirts ran very smoothly.

Hmmm, I just made it to the moon this morning. Performance might be in flux from the patch, but the moon for me does not run any better than the town on Koboh.

Koboh's outskirts are a mixed bag, I drops to 30 FPS in some areas. Where you hit 100 FPS, I hit my 75 FPS VSync. If I am not hitting the 75 FPS cap, then I'm getting between 30-40 FPS, and very seldomly will I get an area that only gets 50-60 FPS.

Originally posted by skitzbuckethatz:

edit: I think the game just runs very differently for everyone. It is definitely not optimised well for PC and evidently it is a complete gamble as to if it will run well or not on varying systems.

Maybe not a gamble, so much as there are problem spots which might be more noticeable on some systems.