Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
yes, this game is more demanding that fallen order, and it is more demanding for a reason. do some research before making such absurd claims
Nope its same like in fallen order
which is unreal 4.
I could only imagine for unreal 5 engine you would need 10k $ card and cpu lol.
I must say I am in a minority of lucky people who can run SWJ: Survivor at semi-decent pace, again based on my 3 or so hours experience. Reports indicated horrible performance from the get-go at Coruscant but my game runs the whole level mostly above 70 FPS. There was one section where my FPS tanked to 45 right as in-game cinematic kicked in. FPS also fluctuates a lot, from 120 in tight corridors down to 60 in areas with large open views and distant playable areas.
I run the game at 1440p at Epic settings and Raytracing off. My rig is i9 12900KF, RTX 3080Ti, 32GB DDR5 RAM, NVMe SSD and Win11.
The game definitely does not run great nor does it look amazing to warrant such performance but it does not completely ruin my experience.
it is the higher poly count and better lighting system
because the difference actually does justify it
Yet somehow they managed to completely ♥♥♥♥ UP the optimization - i have to say this is on the same of BATMAN ARKHAM KNIGHT back in 2015.
Optimization and usage is a DAMN JOKE i'm getting :
CPU : 44%
GPU : 23%