安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Saying PC has the "largest library of games" is like saying a landfill has the largest collection of things. It's where things go to die after everyone is done using it.
Are you the fabled "modern gamer"?
I'm sure you didn't miss the point and are just being an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. I warn you though, I'm probably a much bigger one. Can't be that old though, otherwise you would appreciate the ability to emulate older console titles, and all the enhanced and restored versions of older games.
There are plenty of games I've missed over the years, it's inevitable. Last month I played Fatal Frame cause I felt like it. You can call older games trash all you want, make fun of the expanded library. Everyone is wrong from time to time, some more than others.
it's not a scam, it's stupid consumer decisions.
I agree...I can't spend a lot of money just to consume more power for frames in games that are inferior to games of the past in almost every way. It's illogical.
But hey, people do... even though they are not guaranteed any specific performance.