Performance on AMD GPUs?

[Jaeger Pilot]

What's it like?

[Caldrin]

7900xtx here and its great at 4k.. about on par with any other modern AAA title at 4k maxed out.

[Rogue]

7900xt and it runs at 120 on the second world. tutorial hovered around 90 last night. Only issue i'm having is a very consistent crash on the second world.

[FearlessJDK]

I'm going to jump in with a sort-of related question. I've been planning to pick up an AMD card. Likely will next week. If I'm looking to run something like this (and future games for about 3-4 years) at either 1080 or maybe 1440 (once I get a monitor that supports it) what card should I be looking at?

Right now I'm hovering between the RX 6700 or 6750.

Also, I know how the numbering for green cards work. x050 is fairly no-frills. and 60/70/80 etc get more powerful. Also the Ti is usually a stronger version. But I'm in the dark on AMD cards.

[APN34Z]

Dont listen to these trolls, game runs horrible no matter your hardware or settings!

[ArielOjosVerdes]

6800 @ 1440p, No issues

[ChodeyPop]

turn off ray tracing on anything pre 7000 series and youre good

[ArielOjosVerdes]

Originally posted by FearlessJDK:

I'm going to jump in with a sort-of related question. I've been planning to pick up an AMD card. Likely will next week. If I'm looking to run something like this (and future games for about 3-4 years) at either 1080 or maybe 1440 (once I get a monitor that supports it) what card should I be looking at?

Right now I'm hovering between the RX 6700 or 6750.

Also, I know how the numbering for green cards work. x050 is fairly no-frills. and 60/70/80 etc get more powerful. Also the Ti is usually a stronger version. But I'm in the dark on AMD cards.

6800 (Non XT) used to have the best Frames per dollar ratio

[ChodeyPop]

Originally posted by FearlessJDK:

I'm going to jump in with a sort-of related question. I've been planning to pick up an AMD card. Likely will next week. If I'm looking to run something like this (and future games for about 3-4 years) at either 1080 or maybe 1440 (once I get a monitor that supports it) what card should I be looking at?

Right now I'm hovering between the RX 6700 or 6750.

Also, I know how the numbering for green cards work. x050 is fairly no-frills. and 60/70/80 etc get more powerful. Also the Ti is usually a stronger version. But I'm in the dark on AMD cards.

xt = ti
6750 is to the 6700 what the 2070 super is to the 2070

[WaywardTraveler]

7900xt running smooth at 3440x1440p at 90+ fps.

[Verios44]

Originally posted by ChodeyPop:

Originally posted by FearlessJDK:

I'm going to jump in with a sort-of related question. I've been planning to pick up an AMD card. Likely will next week. If I'm looking to run something like this (and future games for about 3-4 years) at either 1080 or maybe 1440 (once I get a monitor that supports it) what card should I be looking at?

Right now I'm hovering between the RX 6700 or 6750.

Also, I know how the numbering for green cards work. x050 is fairly no-frills. and 60/70/80 etc get more powerful. Also the Ti is usually a stronger version. But I'm in the dark on AMD cards.

xt = ti
6750 is to the 6700 what the 2070 super is to the 2070

As a Rx6750XT user I love it. It has not let me down in over a year. I have not yet purchased this game but it has been quite stable even in games where constant Nvidia complaints occur. Chief example for me is Destiny 2.

I use the XFX Merc 319 version. If AMD is chosen I would go with XFX, Sapphire or PowerColor brands over stuff like MSI, Asus, Gigabyte, etc.

[Cuddle Bunny!]

Latest drivers with a 7900 XTX 4k ultra 120 is so beautiful

[FearlessJDK]

Originally posted by ChodeyPop:

Originally posted by FearlessJDK:

I'm going to jump in with a sort-of related question. I've been planning to pick up an AMD card. Likely will next week. If I'm looking to run something like this (and future games for about 3-4 years) at either 1080 or maybe 1440 (once I get a monitor that supports it) what card should I be looking at?

Right now I'm hovering between the RX 6700 or 6750.

Also, I know how the numbering for green cards work. x050 is fairly no-frills. and 60/70/80 etc get more powerful. Also the Ti is usually a stronger version. But I'm in the dark on AMD cards.

xt = ti
6750 is to the 6700 what the 2070 super is to the 2070

So the 6750 is better? I'm asking because a local retailer has both the 6700XT and 6750 XT and the MSRP for the 6700 699 (CAD) and the 6750 is 629.

So the 6750 has a lower MSRP, which seems weird to me.

[!!ZuEs!!]

There is still a cpu bottleneck with an all AMD system, but it by far better then it what is happening with Intel-nvidia setups. I am running 3440x1440 and getting steady 60-70 FPS ultra settings NO RT with 6800xt and 5800 cpu.

[Verios44]

Originally posted by FearlessJDK:

Originally posted by ChodeyPop:

xt = ti
6750 is to the 6700 what the 2070 super is to the 2070

So the 6750 is better? I'm asking because a local retailer has both the 6700XT and 6750 XT and the MSRP for the 6700 699 (CAD) and the 6750 is 629.

So the 6750 has a lower MSRP, which seems weird to me.

The biggest difference is that a 6750XT is pre factory tuned and a bit higher preformance. It can kiss 6800 levels of preformance. So yes if the cost is good its a better overall option.

Whats the models? Eg MSI trio, Sapphire Pulse etc

[Jaeger Pilot]

Originally posted by FearlessJDK:

Originally posted by ChodeyPop:

xt = ti
6750 is to the 6700 what the 2070 super is to the 2070

So the 6750 is better? I'm asking because a local retailer has both the 6700XT and 6750 XT and the MSRP for the 6700 699 (CAD) and the 6750 is 629.

So the 6750 has a lower MSRP, which seems weird to me.

Yes, 6750 is newer and better.