Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Realistically I’m waiting one full year. And even then I don’t imagine they totally fix performance whether on pc or consoles. Might be inherent design flaw that only next gen rigs will power through.
Exactly my thoughts..
Intel and AMD seem to be working on reducing wasted energy, which may result in higher clock speeds, by how much I am not sure. The 13900K does seem to be able to reach a 5.8GHz Turbo.
A modern CPU (Intel "K" series?) with a LHe / LN2 cryobath might be able to power through the design flaw. Apparently, there was an AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer CPU that got 8.42...GHz. I'd like to see the game running on that configuration.
Anyway, if Intel's E-Cores are any indication, the push is going to be towards lower clock speeds and more cores.