Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
JFC.
I can see the overall logic as there are situations where certain character designs or even certain actor/actress choices don't feel exactly correct but I do have to ask, why does Cameron Monaghan not fit? Let me put this a different way. Imagine if a twenty-something Mark Hamill had been cast in that role, would he fit in the Star Wars style? I know that sounds like a silly question but think about it for a minute. Take a look at Mark Hamill back in 'A New Hope' and notice that he also has that very boyish, very innocent look. He isn't terribly grizzled or physically mature. He and Cameron Monaghan share a lot in common in terms of the general "vibe" they give off.
I would ask the same question when it comes to Diego Luna (Andor). What about him specifically doesn't fit in Star Wars? His physical features and even general character style fits in pretty seamlessly with the original trilogy Star Wars aesthetic style. There isn't really anything about the actor that jumps out as aesthetically off.
Perhaps I could put it this way. If we were to get transported back to the 70's and Cameron Monaghan was casted as Luke Skywalker instead of Mark Hamill, it wouldn't change anything on an aesthetic or character concept level. They are both very much in the "Boyish farmer's son who wants to be more" visual category.
Don't get me wrong. There are absolutely limits. With a property like Star Wars, it is not a great idea to pick actors/actresses that maintain a very distinctly trendy look. You are probably not going to want to see hipster undercuts or that "TikTok boy haircut" (the one with the short sides and fluffy, curly top). You don't want anything that will look horrifically, obviously dated in a few years. Fortunately, Star Wars as a franchise has always been pretty good about avoiding that.
I'm pretty sure you aren't the only one begging for jester points.
Apparently money can't buy a healthy emotional reaction to the appearance of an actor.
OK, I'll bait. What exactly is wrong with this guy ? And even if he looks stupid, it's him, not you. Do you associate yourself with the protagonist in each game ? What about Untitled Goose Game and similar ?
I also may skip this game but it will be for reasons that make some sense, like the greedy price tag or the bloatware called Origin, but your reason is kinda funny.
I am not exactly calling you "crazy" but you did post a topic on the game's forum where you deliver a very strong "hot take" where you say (of the real-life motion capture/voice actor) "the way he looks just doesnt belong in star wars at all." as if "doesn't belong in Star Wars at all" means anything. You delivered a pretty strong opinion that (when one actually takes a look at various cast members of the films and shows) doesn't really add up and really is just the kind of thing that most people wouldn't really devote a lot of energy into thinking about or dwelling on.
To put this into perspective. You created a thread where you critique the real appearance of a real person with the flimsy justification that they "Don't belong in Star Wars at all". On the face of it, such commentary is pretty cruel and unnecessary. It is the kind of thing that really brings us back to the completely insane, completely illogical internet uproar that led to cast members in the new trilogy getting insulted and threatened by angry, internet addled outrage addicts via Youtube, Twitter, and other social media outlets.
Glad to be of service.