Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No ♥♥♥♥ sherlock, do you thinking that everyone about you are stupid and didnt know that the chance to truly penetrate an well forged plate armor in reallity was near by zero?
The decison that Bows and crossbows can penetrate plate armor in game easly has nothing to do with hollywood, as with fun to use and play with ranged weapons.
Noone woud use a ranged weapon (bows and crossbows) in KcD2 if they cant do 70% plus time any effective dmg.
I mean, heavy crossbows were designed to penetrate plate armour even, at certain distances.
A 1000 Ib plus (heavy) crossbows with bodkin bolts can penetrate good plate armor, yes, but they was ofside of sieges normaly to impractical.
The normal used corssbow with so maximum 450 to 600 Ib was primary desigend to be used from people with a low training level, not to penetrate primary good armored knights in plates.
A bow needs a much more well trained user, to be fire effective as a crossbow.
I am not denying that a bow needs more training and skill than a crossbow, lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBxdTkddHaE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ds-Ev5msyzo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf7KCqQLw78
Bow's start to shine once you get them close to 200 power with improved arrows, that's when you start to one tap head shot with them.
Early game hunting it's either poison or crossbow.
Stay away from winch loaded siege crossbow's, they were used with a pavese tower shield rammed into the ground as cover to reload in a combat situation or behind walls. You can use them to open combat to get a 100 percent first shot kill on the heaviest opponent of a camp but that's it.
Btw, arrows need a short time after release to stabilize themself for max penetration.
We did penetration tests on several things like car doors and breast plates ourselfes in the past and as long as you don't use something like that 160lbs bow in the video (which btw. only a handful of people can even draw with precision today) penetration in up to 25 meters or 35+ yards on a moving target is almost impossible to the point that the arrow will actually manage to pierce a vital spot. You may penetrate, but you won't get any deeper than a couple of cm through the gambeson. Either you hit the chain linked intersectons on the armor which count as weak spots or you won't get a lethal or at least crucially weakening shot out.
Btw, that video about arrow penetration doesn't test the fact that ballistic archery was primarily done with english longbows on the battle field and direct aiming was practiced only in target shooting or if the sh**t hit the fan. Most stronger bows were also drawn to the upper breast instead to the chin.
The fearsome power of the english longbow came through it's heavier arrows and the speed the arrows buiild up while coming down in a ballistic curve on the battlefield. Raining down arrows will come in mind here.
Gravity play's a huge factor in this and there aren't many serious tests with ballistic archery verus armor up to find unless you have the books for them.
Can you make a video of it and show it to us ?