HONEST FEEDBACK AFTER 7 HOURS

[Skywalker]

will try to keep this short and to the point.

1. game looks absolutely stunning, there is no question about that. However the animal models..... look like a cheap asset flip from the Unity asset store. I mean, I am not asking for RDR2 level of fidelity but come one guys. This is terrible. The animation is crap, no fur simulation, basic 2D textures, horse eyes never blink and the list goes on. Again, not asking for RDR2 fidelity because nothing WILL EVER come close to RDR2, but still, you could do better than this Warhorse.

2. I get it - you want to tell a story, a narrative, but gosh there is SO MUCH dialog in this game. Watching the Doc playing this game was funny as hell. he uninstalled it after 3 hours. Honestly, I think Warhorse spent more money on recording the dialogs and mocaps than actual coding.

3. I personally HATE first person games, but I decided to give KCD2 a try because of the hype (never played the first one, nor do I care to). What's the point of having so much cosmetic variety if you can't see it? Ok, you wanted a unique fighting gameplay/style that requires first person perspective. Sure, but why everything else has to be in first person? KCD2 could have been 10x better if it was in third person.

4. The game , well at least at the beginning, feels like is designed to irritate the HELL out of you. First, the tutorials are not that helpful because they disappear too quickly, then comes the super restrictive save mechanic. Well, at least it didn't get me to rage quit like Elden Ring did yet :D.

[KamelittaOida]

Originally posted by Skywalker:

game. Watching the Doc playing this game was funny as hell. he uninstalled it after 3 hours.

lol

Originally posted by Skywalker:

3. I personally HATE first person games, but I decided to give KCD2 a try because of the hype (never played the first one, nor do I care to). What's the point of having so much cosmetic variety if you can't see it? Ok, you wanted a unique fighting gameplay/style that requires first person perspective. Sure, but why everything else has to be in first person?

I never understood this logic. I understand from a skins and marketing perspective, but AFK you also put on ♥♥♥♥ that only others really get to see. ?

Originally posted by Skywalker:

KCD2 could have been 10x better if it was in third person.

no

[Skywalker]

Originally posted by KamelittaOida:

I never understood this logic. I understand from a skins and marketing perspective, but AFK you also put on ♥♥♥♥ that only others really get to see. ?

You do understand that KCD2 is a single player game right?
now tell me, what's the point of buying cosmetic gear, skins or pimp up your horse if only the NPCs can see it (and sometimes comment on it)?
The only time you can actually see what you look like is during a cut scene.

anyhow, it's a pointless argument because it's totally subjective. I hate first person games (KCD2 is really an exception because it was done exceptionally well) and you don't.

I personally prefer games like RDR2, The Witcher, Assassin Creed , Crimson Desert and the list goes on.

there is a reason why most FP games are kiddies pew pew FPS games you can run on a calculator, and RPG games are in 3rd person.
I think the ONLY reason KCD2 is in FP is because of it's unique combat system, which would be nearly impossible to do in 3rd person.