Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Right. You've just shown your hand, you're fishing for points. When you try to be controversial It's better to not be so obvious. You have to be more subtle, 10/10 for effort though. Protip: you have to pay attention to the intelligence of the poster you're trying to fool. For example in my case you were obviously up against something that has about +100% more IQ points than you so you have to tread carefully and you've blown it XD
wait..wait,wait,wait... SO.. let's consider this:
You mean we're all supposed to restart our save files and begin again.. you mean it was it was a piece of ♥♥♥♥♥ at launch and shoved out the door... so to play it properly after 70 odd hours in, we've got to start again for this to be any use to us... And if we're NOT starting again.. we're left with comedy hair cuts for 62gb..
The technical aspects are what we paid to be fixed for us, it's really not the customers issue. It's not a blessing to have someone fix the camera on your phone a year after purchase, and want to take it away from you for a period of time out of your control but suits the manufacturer.
Once again it serves me right for buying a game at launch. While it's not in the awful state the first game was on day one (it got hate and it deserved hate) you get a better product for waiting for it to be sale.... don't you? there's no point in paying for this junk anymore
The update worked perfectly fine for me. Seems to be an issue on your end.
Too the my people with slow internet....I feel your pain and sympathize right now. lol
As for this game the first map was fine I had maybe 1 progress blocking bug and a very few graphical glitches. The second was a bugfest there is no excuse for it. I am personally used to it I can fix it to myself with some reloads and console however it was a choice to release it as such. Great if they fixed the bulk now but it still was a choice.
Otherwise we have to assume the developers actually did not play the second map because some bugs are easily reproducible.
I would not call it junk my self I have a great time with it but my tolerance for issues is probably a lot higher as it is my job to deal with them outside of games. But viewing it from a non tech consumer it was a poor choice. Business wise most likely not a option to delay it due to cost and pr but that is not something a consumer thinks about.
Take it as a warning that reviews are often dishonest or the professional reviewers are simply incompetent. Because any who got to visit the second map should have seen at-least a dozen of issues cropping up. The patch notes are the proof of that.
You are still spreading your bs and that's particular funny because you initially said something like "has absolutely no clue how development works".
Kiddo, I'll explain it to you now: Every patch modifies binary files. There are tools out there, that fully build the difference of old and new file, spit out that delta and it's ready to ship, so that it will be patched together again on the customers side.
That way the patches would be tiny. This is how it has been done for decades. It doesn't matter if an engine cannot do it, competent developers could write a patcher for themselves with the tools out there. It's literally nothing but two folders full of subfolders and binaryfiles and all you need to do is go through them, build the deltas and ship all the ♥♥♥♥. That's it! It doesn't matter what files these are, it doesn't matter what engine is used.
And for new assets of a patch, they would surely not be that large compared to the entire game data.
This entire ♥♥♥♥ show is nothing but pure incompetence, greed and laziness of modern studios.
And Dunning-Kruger examples like you, who know absolut nothing about software development, support this nonsense.
Greetings,
a developer.
This feels more like a break to me then work though. I wish my regular change logs where as small as these xd