Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Well that includes you then obviously. Large games do not necessarily need large patches every time an update drops. It's all to do with how the game is packaged and distributed. BG3 had the same issue and then Larian repackaged the install so patched files could usually be downloaded on a smaller scale. Educate yourself before accusing others of ignorance.
I'll give you credit where credit is due, while I dont care about the update size, what you are saying is true.
What are you talking about, I have 3TB NVM SSD and I don't have any space problem. Is that what you understand from reading it?
Steam does not allow that method native as far as I am aware thus it would require a separate updating application to be packaged with the game to circumvent that. Or the developers need use a difference archive type or simply smaller packages mitigating it to some extent.
There are pro and cons to them all and you can not make everyone happy in any of these options.
Here is a list of what is actually changed.
https://steamdb.info/patchnotes/17662848/#changed-files
higher quality assets take up more space, it's basic stuff