Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Embracer's main source of troubles when it was having them was it's over reliance on loans from Swedish banks that facilitated it's rapid growth. Then a combination of Covid and Swedish banks realising that inflation exists and drastically upping the interests rates caused all that.
A big game selling fine isn't going to tank the entire group. Your whole complaint is that based on preliminary information the game sold OK. Not badly but just fine.
I agree, they are not good for the indie scene and gaming in general.
Their work force went from 15k to 10k probably be more now. They had to sell off a bunch of indy companies including one of my favorite.
I don't even agree with the "it sold fine part". IT only cost 40 mill to make and reached a peak player count higher than most games that cost more than double reach and those games tend to sell well.
No such thing, totally made up term to insult and brow beat people. Never worked on me.
The one you just made up at this second to suit a narrative that exist solely in your head?
Why are you people so vague all the freaking time?
If you like banks controlling game narratives and destroying continuity for social agendas, that just means you lack principles.