Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There is currently no FG. Cutscenes are hard locked to 30fps, but lossless scaling worked greatly for it. now my game is running at 80-90fps, with much smoother images, cutscenes are also bumped to 60fps looking much smoother
thanks for the info. disappointing there's no HDR as that really makes games look next-gen these days. i will try to do auto-HDR and see if it works
haven't seen performance but i agree that dlss quality and balanced look identical in motion and nearly identical on screenshots (i compared it myself). never saw a game before where dlss quality and balanced looked literally identical. its impressive.
what that other guy with the 4070 ti wrote though is not true. he's definitely NOT playing it at 3440x1440p with DLAA @60fps without drops below. no chance. with dlss quality its possible but sometimes only barely as the game has some 60fps cutscenes that are quite demanding (i can easily play the game @dlss quality without dropping below 60fps maxed out, but some cutscenes drop into the 50s, so i took balanced and it looks identical in motion and even those demanding cutscenes aren't dropping below 60fps now