Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The fact that they were so tolerant of BG3 gives them credibility, IMHO.
The honest answer is "we don't know"
it is highly likely that watching the gay scene is absolutely optional, that is what the devs said.
However that Henry is gay or bisexual is a given as he is written with a gay romance option in mind, if the gay romance scene involves Hans (which we do not know, though leaks have said it is so) then it brings into question all that happened in KCD one between the two characters.
My position is, Henry is now gay, because he is designed this way and that is not optional, if you act on that and watch a gay sex scene or relationship (we don't know) that part is highly likely to be optional.
That said, I want to add that warhorse Lied and tried to hide a lot about the situation, both the LGBTQ content and the implementation of Musa of Mali
that looks like some nicely developed paranoia
Of course he is, he certainly is not straight as he was before as is confirmed by warhorse.
It's a retcon, face it, no need to call it anything else, especially not "character development" or something like that. It's in line with all other modern gaming "messages" we had in droves lately.
Rarely are things "same as before" nowadays, with this stuff there's usually no "sacrifice the finger to spare the whole hand".
I've just seen too much of these examples so now i follow the old proverb "If your mouth is burned by milk, you blow before you eat yogurt".
Plus, i just dislike it out of principle. I don't respect these kind of retcons. I don't like idea of retconing previously straight character into bisexual, i played first game, even if Henry doesn't pursue women, he shows very obvious attraction to them and none to men.
If they wanted it, KCD2 could have had a different, new protagonist to do this, and it wouldn't be a retcon.
I don't oppose the addition of homosexuality in medieval games, obviously it existed in real life past, and even in KCD1 there were gay characters. I just oppose what feels like a retcon in making Henry bisexual.
As RPG player, having option to explore such an idea in medieval setting is actually kinda interesting, but it should be done with new character. Not an established one.
You know Henry is not real?
You don't think a gay character in a medieval world were being gay is a huge risk would not make for an interesting tale?
that is some serious BS you coming out with. wishful thinking is too strong for you right? isen't it enough already for you, you are gay irl? why is it you want everything to be gay? that is pathetic that you feel your homosexuality is more important than anything else in your life. get some help
No that all came from a hoax site, there is a gay romance option but its totally ignorable and skippable if YOU the player decides to engage in it