chud tears

[King]

I'm shocked at the fragility of the anti-woke crowd, truly. This is no different than that Anita chick crying about sexism in games. It's like you guys don't play games for fun and only want your world view reflec- oh.

Keep it up guys

[Колбаска]

Originally posted by Inari:

Originally posted by HereticRivga:

The "screeching left wing" is such a tiny % of the left wing, that it is difficult to find any posts from them in these forums. But the rights equivenant they seem every where.

Well yes, that tiny % of the left wing are not buying games and support the devs who are trying to implement all these DEI options for them. This is something I cannot understand, why add all of these options in the first place for these people, if they don't show up to play the games? Just to check the DEI checkboxes from a list and get some easy money from investors? Why would I support such a team of devs that purposely add pointless options in an RPG, and also create backlash on social media while hiding such details from their customers?! I pay for the games I play, I have my self respect as a gamer, and I cannot support such devs, good game or not.

The problem is that it takes a lot of money to develop. Investors usually give money, but investors often do not understand the games and look very superficially. The development of woke and dei was also due to the fact that their fans were able to shout loudly and call everyone who disagreed racists and sexists. Investors didn't like such words, because in their opinion it would affect sales, and they tried to make sure that these people didn't scream, because at first the players were tolerant of woke in games. Also, do not forget about corporations that purposefully promote dei and woke. Now people are starting to get bored with their screams and they are starting to develop immunity to them. I hope that eventually games will become art again without political interference.

[Targonis]

Originally posted by HereticRivga:

Originally posted by Inari:

Well yes, that tiny % of the left wing are not buying games and support the devs who are trying to implement all these DEI options for them. This is something I cannot understand, why add all of these options in the first place for these people, if they don't show up to play the games? Just to check the DEI checkboxes from a list and get some easy money from investors? Why would I support such a team of devs that purposely add pointless options in an RPG, and also create backlash on social media while hiding such details from their customers?! I pay for the games I play, I have my self respect as a gamer, and I cannot support such devs, good game or not.

How do you not understand? People must have told you 1000 times.

I will tell you, as it comes from experience. I worked in the games industry at the beginning of my career out of uni.

Amd what is striking about it is the % of LBGT+ people who work there. Someone else will have to tell you why the games industry as I don't know, but the facts are this industry has a large %.

Like any semi creative industry those devs want to reflect themselves in their work.

Really as simple as that, no illuminati controlling their minds, no reptile people in a board room.

Now if you want to make a ame company that is Chud friendly, go ahead.

As someone who will GENERALLY support the LGBT+ when it comes to stuff, there is a big difference between having representation within any form of entertainment and having a big, "Let's show the world how nice LGBT+ relationships are and talk about LGBT+", rather than it just being treated as, "cool characters who happen to be LGBT+", rather than, "Here's a LGBT+ character, let's devote time to showing that they should be respected". When it seemed like EVERY TV show had to have a gay man on it, too many times it was the "flamboyantly gay" men that were shown, not the generally normal men who happened to be gay and just accepted for being who they are. That is the issue that I have when it comes to games, and honestly, if you played Dragon Age: Veilguard, you would know that Taash was done horribly, as an example of how NOT to do it.

With that said, the anti-woke people actually encourage me to check out games when they are against a game because of their crying about LGBT+ and "woke", because those babies just can't handle when LGBT+ is done decently. They were against Forza Horizon 5 ahead of launch, or Hogwarts Legacy. They cry continually about crap that doesn't make the game bad or overly PROMOTING LGBT+.

[Kenneth]

It's more of a shrug and a head shake. They don't seem to learn that "forcing change" doesn't work through entertainment. Ubisoft seems to have a small problem with this approach at this moment in time.

[Siegfried of the Flaming Rose]

Originally posted by King:

I'm shocked at the fragility of the anti-woke crowd, truly. This is no different than that Anita chick crying about sexism in games. It's like you guys don't play games for fun and only want your world view reflec- oh.

Keep it up guys

Private Profile, Level 0, spam account, farming for jester awards, next.

[Coach the Roach]

Originally posted by DrZann:

Originally posted by King:

I'm shocked at the fragility of the woke crowd...

Surely you jest. The woke have long surpassed the SJWs in shrill victimhood.

Fixed your sentence to match real life accuracy.

[[Heretic]Rivga]

Originally posted by Dragonirian:

Originally posted by HereticRivga:

How do you not understand? People must have told you 1000 times.

I will tell you, as it comes from experience. I worked in the games industry at the beginning of my career out of uni.

Amd what is striking about it is the % of LBGT+ people who work there. Someone else will have to tell you why the games industry as I don't know, but the facts are this industry has a large %.

Like any semi creative industry those devs want to reflect themselves in their work.

Really as simple as that, no illuminati controlling their minds, no reptile people in a board room.

Now if you want to make a ame company that is Chud friendly, go ahead.

Any company before 2012?

I'd left the games industry by 2012 so all my experience is before then.

[[Heretic]Rivga]

Originally posted by Targonis:

Originally posted by HereticRivga:

How do you not understand? People must have told you 1000 times.

I will tell you, as it comes from experience. I worked in the games industry at the beginning of my career out of uni.

Amd what is striking about it is the % of LBGT+ people who work there. Someone else will have to tell you why the games industry as I don't know, but the facts are this industry has a large %.

Like any semi creative industry those devs want to reflect themselves in their work.

Really as simple as that, no illuminati controlling their minds, no reptile people in a board room.

Now if you want to make a ame company that is Chud friendly, go ahead.

As someone who will GENERALLY support the LGBT+ when it comes to stuff, there is a big difference between having representation within any form of entertainment and having a big, "Let's show the world how nice LGBT+ relationships are and talk about LGBT+", rather than it just being treated as, "cool characters who happen to be LGBT+", rather than, "Here's a LGBT+ character, let's devote time to showing that they should be respected". When it seemed like EVERY TV show had to have a gay man on it, too many times it was the "flamboyantly gay" men that were shown, not the generally normal men who happened to be gay and just accepted for being who they are. That is the issue that I have when it comes to games, and honestly, if you played Dragon Age: Veilguard, you would know that Taash was done horribly, as an example of how NOT to do it.

With that said, the anti-woke people actually encourage me to check out games when they are against a game because of their crying about LGBT+ and "woke", because those babies just can't handle when LGBT+ is done decently. They were against Forza Horizon 5 ahead of launch, or Hogwarts Legacy. They cry continually about crap that doesn't make the game bad or overly PROMOTING LGBT+.

Yes I agree, some characters are poorly written, but outside of veilguard I see this as just bad writing.
Let's face it some heterosexual relationships are written so badly it is embarrassing to even watch a cut scene.

The Miranda of mass effect one when she is talking about being objectifies whilst the camera is set firmly on her arse. If that was meant to be ironic and funny great! But it was not it was meant to be a serious conversation where she opens up.

We have a double standard if a LBGT encounter is poorly written we jump up and down and say it is because they are forced into the game.
If a heterosexual encounter is equally poorly written we just call it bad writing.

[LeftPaw]

Originally posted by HereticRivga:

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

The problem is that a large number of the anti-woke people don't have a firm understanding of what DEI is. They don't know what to look for, what to flag as DEI or what is worthy of reporting.
It's like they move into a new house and on the wall is a picture of a mouse. This is enough to convince them that the house is infested with mice.

You are kind of implying these guys are dumb and only a few select anti-woke are intelligent enough to know the "true path".

Not really. They can be led-on or simply enjoy causing mayhem. But yeah a few maybe a few just don't care and joining in on something that gives them stature with their friends.
Someone serious about the culling of DEI knows exactly what it is and where to find it They can usually find a red flag in the first 10 minutes of game-play. But those people are not here. Or, are here and are thinking of buying the game.

It's not really a case of being a idiot. It's the human condition that can make us act like idiots.

[Pikippon]

DEI is when you force inclusion on the player.

This is a historical setting game with a cannon character that was straight (confirmed by the studio).
They made him Bisexual, indeed dialogue options represents the thought in your character's head before talking, if accepting a gay romance is here it means that it doesn't bother you thus making you bi.
Non straight people in these times were treated harshly, notably, death sentence.
The gay character has been confirmed by vavra to be central to the story thus immortal and probably plot armored aswell.

This makes the game wokish and thus warhose dropped the pants and bend over, they are not on the level of failguard but well on their way to achieve such greatness.

Else they could have made a character creator, if kcd 1 doesn't matter as it seems to be, why not ? If you could make your character there wouldn't be much controverse, maybe to the lack of possibility to execute such "sinner".

[LeftPaw]

I keep thinking that they must have something with this woke thing in the game but I can't find any of it. When I ask them where is the woke please, they go on about a gay option and a black dude. Yeah. okay but where is the woke?

[[Heretic]Rivga]

Originally posted by Колбаска:

The problem is that it takes a lot of money to develop. Investors usually give money, but investors often do not understand the games and look very superficially. The development of woke and dei was also due to the fact that their fans were able to shout loudly and call everyone .

I mean this sounds stupid, how is it that only the Woke seem to have money to invest?

When we look at most of the billionaires they are anything but woke, something does not add up, almost like you are just making all this up. The amount of capital available to invest that have "Woke" policies would be so insignificantly small vs the entire global market of investments - seem odd that EVERY gaming company you guys done like seem to only go after this money.