Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Take for instance, RDR2,,, they rob and murder but they're racially colorblind and treat the women as equals, except well, for Micah -- but you get the point. If KCD2 can pull off having the "modern audience" trophy words and experiences treated authentically as they would in the past, well, that would be kinda ground-breaking.
I'm saying that it was forced inclusion for the second game, but that he forced the inclusion in a manner that would not make happy the LGBTQ+ side Trying to 'own them'.
The problem was that he did the inclusion on the wrong character and that is what made it feel out of place because he used it on the protagonist instead of other character like in the first game and he could of do that exact thing with other important NPC.
The Musa guy is totally a DEI thing an is inexcusable no doubt about it but gay characters where already present and where not a problem because it added to history accuracy but the way that it was approached was not accurate in any way too.
Making Henry gay is the problem that is for sure, there where no foreshadowing for it in any part of the first game