Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I agree with that to a point. But I Henry has made a fairly detailed map of the Trosky region with several key points and many not so key points labeled for future reference and to show his horse when he wants to half sleep on the way. Obviously Henry is a skilled cartographer.
It just seems silly that a character with such a skill would not have made a note of each room in the castle and what they were used for as he made his way through each of them. ;)
The point of this gamedesign is immersion which means avoiding meta gaming like magically knowing which rooms there are and where they as much as possible.
You gotta walk around and find the way yourself.
No because part of the game as an RPG is find out where those places are. It's not hard at all in tbat regard. As you're supposed to learn where each person lives, their daily routine and such. That's how KCD 1 and 2 is meant yo be played.
100% agree...But there is no learning. Learning would be mapping it out like Henry does with the entire Trosky region or in the first game, with Rattay and Skalitz.
As he passes the spots he maps them out.
Trosky is the first castle I've encounter between the two games that Henry didn't map out.