Which version of FSR/DLSS

[Rahul]

Developers please clarify which version of dlss and FSR is used and also there is Frame Generation or not

[Mua（づ￣3￣）づ ❤～]

They didn't use FRS or DLSS.It's Native FPS.I guess you don't need to be afraid if game support FRS\DLSS,all the new 3A games support FSR/DLSS after 2023

[Rahul]

Yes that's what I am asking which version of upscaling is there FSR 3 or FSR 2 or FSR3.1

[Invasion_Dec]

Its a demanding game. There will be upscaling and frame generation for both AMD and Nvidia GPUs, so that as many people as possible can get an enjoyable experience. They know that making the game too inaccessible it will hurt sales. They have also ditched Denuvo, which frees up CPU cycles for better performance.

The advertised system requirements is based on native render (no upscaling or frame generation) and the recommended specs is probably for 1440p

For Nvidia, you can simply replace the DLSS file to use newer versions of the tech. Just like in all existing games that support DLSS

For AMD, this game will probably get FSR version at least 3.1, which has a DLL which you can swap out to upgrade to newer versions just like DLSS

[Witski]

Originally posted by Invasion_Dec:

Its a demanding game. There will be upscaling and frame generation for both AMD and Nvidia GPUs, so that as many people as possible can get an enjoyable experience. They know that making the game too inaccessible it will hurt sales. They have also ditched Denuvo, which frees up CPU cycles for better performance.

The advertised system requirements is based on native render (no upscaling or frame generation) and the recommended specs is probably for 1440p

For Nvidia, you can simply replace the DLSS file to use newer versions of the tech. Just like in all existing games that support DLSS

For AMD, this game will probably get FSR version at least 3.1, which has a DLL which you can swap out to upgrade to newer versions just like DLSS

damn, without denuvo we will have 0.001 more fps :D

[Grubbs008]

Originally posted by Witski:

Originally posted by Invasion_Dec:

Its a demanding game. There will be upscaling and frame generation for both AMD and Nvidia GPUs, so that as many people as possible can get an enjoyable experience. They know that making the game too inaccessible it will hurt sales. They have also ditched Denuvo, which frees up CPU cycles for better performance.

The advertised system requirements is based on native render (no upscaling or frame generation) and the recommended specs is probably for 1440p

For Nvidia, you can simply replace the DLSS file to use newer versions of the tech. Just like in all existing games that support DLSS

For AMD, this game will probably get FSR version at least 3.1, which has a DLL which you can swap out to upgrade to newer versions just like DLSS

damn, without denuvo we will have 0.001 more fps :D

More like 5-10. But keep trying.

[Bejo]

Originally posted by Witski:

damn, without denuvo we will have 0.001 more fps :D

Tell that to people who got the DMC5 build without denuvo leaks back then, they got better fps - 5-10 fps - than people who bought it just because no denuvo

[Witski]

Originally posted by Bejo:

Originally posted by Witski:

damn, without denuvo we will have 0.001 more fps :D

Tell that to people who got the DMC5 build without denuvo leaks back then, they got better fps - 5-10 fps - than people who bought it just because no denuvo

Compared to what and in what circumstance?
What did they use?
Same situation?
Same location?
Same room temperature?
What build did they " leaked " and what build was released? What changed between those builds?

Sorry but people like you and others that must prove something doesn't know how to test something in the first place, like the famous video about denuvo where each clip have different processors( casually the denuvo one had an old one and the version without had a much better cpu in builds that were months or years apart from each other), sorry but no thanks, all BS.

[FrostyBud777]

it's listed right now on amd that is ONLY HAS FSR 2.2 What! I hope not , and if so, I am glad I will get a 5080 in 21 days.
https://community.amd.com/t5/gaming-discussions/latest-amd-fsr-2-amp-3-supported-games-list/td-p/549534

[Witski]

Originally posted by FrostyBud777:

it's listed right now on amd that is ONLY HAS FSR 2.2 What! I hope not , and if so, I am glad I will get a 5080 in 21 days.
https://community.amd.com/t5/gaming-discussions/latest-amd-fsr-2-amp-3-supported-games-list/td-p/549534

You don't need dlss or fsr with such high end cards to begin with..at this point use a cheaper card and use those crap fake frames and bad quality images lol.

[General Plastro]

Originally posted by FrostyBud777:

it's listed right now on amd that is ONLY HAS FSR 2.2 What! I hope not , and if so, I am glad I will get a 5080 in 21 days.
https://community.amd.com/t5/gaming-discussions/latest-amd-fsr-2-amp-3-supported-games-list/td-p/549534

As the other user said, theres no point in making your experience worse by generating fake frames with lots of artifacts when you have a high end GPU like the 5080.

Frame generation is a crutch/stop gap solution for lower end GPUs to fake 1440p/4k, not for high end ones, you dont need fake resolution.

Just disable FSR and DLSS althogether and just run the game native to your resolution.

You ONLY need FSR or DLSS in those circunstances if you have some sort of extremely large TV/Monitor that goes into 8k territory.

[FrostyBud777]

I want to run DLSS quality or FSR 3.1 and ULTRA Experimental settings at 4k 120 fps. If it only has fsr 2.2 and the amd offical website is true, that would be very disappointing. Even way of the hunter has dlss but not FSR, so I am going back to nvidia this gen cause better prices and dlss. I miss dlss the past two years. I want every jaggie gone forever.
They have full images with comparison sliders and performance chart here! I want DLSS. 5080 instead of my 7900xtx.
It does show 7900xtx with FSR will only get 81 fps at 4k. SO I would have to run performance mode maybe, and DLSS performance mode is always better than FSR at performance mode.
https://en.gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/kingdom-come-deliverance-ii-prevyu-test-gpu-cpu

[Guiflick]

Incredible, a new release using fsr 2.2. What a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ load of ♥♥♥♥.

[Tomcat2]

Originally posted by FrostyBud777:

I want to run DLSS quality or FSR 3.1 and ULTRA Experimental settings at 4k 120 fps. If it only has fsr 2.2 and the amd offical website is true, that would be very disappointing. Even way of the hunter has dlss but not FSR, so I am going back to nvidia this gen cause better prices and dlss. I miss dlss the past two years. I want every jaggie gone forever.
They have full images with comparison sliders and performance chart here! I want DLSS. 5080 instead of my 7900xtx.
It does show 7900xtx with FSR will only get 81 fps at 4k. SO I would have to run performance mode maybe, and DLSS performance mode is always better than FSR at performance mode.
https://en.gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/kingdom-come-deliverance-ii-prevyu-test-gpu-cpu

You don't need more FPS, it is not a competitive FPS shooter, 80FPS is enough ;)

[Grubbs008]

The game doesn't even have Frame Generation. And the FSR makes the game lag enough more.

[btanis20]

Nvidia owners were always able to sideload the latest DLL file, so why complain whenever the devs opt for an older DLSS version?

As for AMD users, the game already has a FidelityFX DLL file; indicating that the game shipped with FSR 3.1 (and not FSR 3.0 or below). Although they're using 3.1.0, you can easily swap out the existing one for the newer 3.1.3 file that's on AMD's Open GPU site.