Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
He also said that the percentage of possible tends to zero. That is, it is practically impossible, since he would simply have been captured or killed on the way. So I described everything correctly.
Also its not a farfetched idea that some few traveled throughout Europe that came from the south, and Mali was at the time way larger than it is today with a coastline, so travel along the coast up to Europe was not really that hard.
LOL
The possibility of Native Americans showing up in Europe in the 1500s could "tend to zero" if Manteo and Wanchese had been brought there by anyone other than Walter Raleigh.
The possibility of Marco Polo travelling to the orient could "tend to zero" if he hadn't written about his travels.
"tend to zero" is the same as "I don't think so but I can't prove it".
And there are more artistic licenses in KCD1 and 2 plots which were not very possible IRL:
1) An abandoned bastard would be recognized by his noble father after 18-20 years.
2) Or that he would be educated in politics, after being raised as a blacksmith.
3) Or that he would become a sword and mace master in 2-3 months - the length of events of KCD1.
4) Or that he would sleep with Ritter's daughter in the 15th century.
But you don't have problems with those artistic licenses, do you? So maybe the problem is not in historical inaccuracy, but your's racism?
You're substituting concepts. With a tendency to zero probability, the Russian throne could be occupied by a black man. According to you, can this serve as a reason to do so if Netflix suddenly starts making films about Russia?
I've already gotten used to the fact that woke adherents are hypocritical. At first, they shout that it could be historical and that it was. But as soon as they are presented with evidence that this is not the case, they immediately begin to say that this is a game and you can fantasize there.
Just admit that Musa and the gay branch were introduced to receive money from investors. And this is finding more and more evidence.
https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/stories/medieval-and-renaissance-ivories
Because usually the goods were sold at the port and were already transported from the port by people of the country to which the goods arrived, this is still the case if you did not know. And also people were very unfriendly, you could be killed for not praying the way they do, even if you are also religious, and for having a great skin color, you would be killed just because you could believe that a man with black skin was an accomplice of the devil. This happened in the past. If you don't like the story, play games about the future instead of changing the story with a fake.
And take the trouble to watch the video, it's really interesting, maybe you'll become a little more educated because of it.
Ignore that actual historic figures exist outside of real timelines. Check.
Ignore that an illiterate son of a blacksmith (but biologically sired by a nobleman) who sports a bandage in the opening sequences of the first game from a girl with a wooden sword becomes one of the best sword fighters ever in just a few months.
I actually laughed out loud when it was revealed that Henry had noble blood, as it seemed like the devs had resorted to The Great Chain of Being, which of course totally explains why Hal gits gud. It's in his blood, Praise God. Lol.
I cannot speak to Bohemia, but I've seen enough paintings from France and England from this time period, and yes indeed there were Africans visiting Europe. A lot? Of course not. And since it's before the advent of the New World Slave Trade, the paintings do not show them in "subservient" positions either.
There's enough politics in the real world as it is, why don't woke adherents stop poking their noses into games first?