Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Best outcome is the path toward reconciliation proposed by Musa. The Monastery is demanding all of the funds, the Brotherhood is demanding all of the funds, Musa is the only voice of reason saying there is enough to fund both.
That was European history. The battles of Kosovo and Nicopolis are even referenced in the game. I didn't even mention the motivations of political actors beyond the Catholic Church which did view Islam as the greatest threat to Europe.
You have to perform some serious mental gymnastics to do quests like Waldensians from KCD1 and get stopped by the Inquisition in KCD2 but then accept a Muslim in the Catholic Church Council. It's absurd.
Facts don't work on True Believers. The mental gymnastics are impressive.
An African potentially being there is not unbelievable. Exceptionally rare, but not impossible. The character of Musa is unbelievable which makes sense as much of his dialogue is untrue. His inclusion as a Muslim in the Catholic Church Council is indefensible.
It's a Catholic Church Council. They're making decisions on behalf of the Pope. It's believable that he would be housed for protection, but there is absolutely no way that he would be involved in decision making for the Catholic Church when he doesn't even worship Christ.
The horse had long since perished, but over it remained a lathered Master Ballistic raining blows upon its rotting flesh. Each slash of the rod followed by his vengeful utterances.
"How dare you not adhere to my belief system!"
"Act in a manner I don't approve of, how dare you!"
"Highlight my inability to except others, how dare you"
Still the corpse remained inert, having long since surrendered its soul. No longer burdened by the weight of others expectations. Numbly awaiting the next undefended blow.
Christians worship Christ, as in Christ is God. Muslims believe that Christ was just a prophet. There has never been any confusion that they worship the same God. Christ and Allah are not the same.
His inclusion in the game on it's own wouldn't be an issue. It's that they made him so unbelievable. His dialogue is straight lies, he makes Mali sound like Wakanda. He goes against every historic description of Mali, including the one by Ibn Battuta who he partly based on. He's a Muslim, shoehorning him into a Catholic Church council is beyond ridiculous.
I honestly didn't care when I saw him at Sigismund's camp. I knew that his dialogue was BS but I thought I would just be able to move on and ignore him. Didn't realize that he would be forced into the end game via absolutely unbelievable circumstances that stretch the bounds of historic fiction and flirt with fantasy.
Sure, I can. It is called historical fiction. You do understand what fiction means, yes?
The only people who cry about "DEI" are racist cuckolds. No one else cares. KCD II is brilliant historical fiction. And you are no historian. If we're to nitpick the one person of color as you are so focused on as being historically inaccurate. Then one must nitpick the entire thing for it is only fair and just to do so. But since you're a racist pos. You'd never agree to such a debate with an actual historian on this topic. You'd just grasp at buzzwords that you do not even understand.
Because I can. If you don't like it. Block and move on, kid.
KCD1 is brilliant historic fiction. KCD2 is much more heavy on the fiction than the history. When you're writing historic fiction, you still have to make it believable. There are limits to creative liberties. I wouldn't have any problem debating a historian on the likelihood of a Muslim being invited to make decisions in a Catholic Church Council in the 15th century, I doubt any would actually debate on that matter. The answer is obvious.
People always try to boil objections down to bigotry. You know why Black characters like Franklin and CJ from the GTA series and Barrett from FF7 are popular? It's because they aren't forced into their stories. They fit into their environments. Musa is forced into this story. He isn't the creator's vision, he's a corporate vision imposed into the creator's story.
This is the problem with DEI, it's takes control away from the creative minds and puts into the hands of investors. I pick on Musa because he is the most egregious example of an unbelievable, out of place character obviously just added to check a box. He doesn't organically fit into the story.
no, in your country you mutilate the genitals of female infants.
the sheer gaul and audacity, they must think we're pretty dumb/ never read a book before.