Rape, incest and bestiality existed back then too.

[Huggers]

But they only include the option to be gay. That's weird, isn't it?
All three of things happened more often than homosexuality, but only gay was included.

[BimboGooch]

Originally posted by BRE Adrien:

b careful they dont ban you for saying this xd

I mean it is against steam tos lmao. Whats wild about them being called woke because theyre banning people, is the fact they have too as its steam tos. If they dont, steam mods them selves will ban them or delete a post.

[Quillithe]

Originally posted by bruh:

wasn't most of this already mentioned or shown in kcd1? like rape was litteraly at the intro of the game

Bold of you to assume these people played KCD 1

[Huggers]

Originally posted by BimboGooch:

Originally posted by BRE Adrien:

b careful they dont ban you for saying this xd

I mean it is against steam tos lmao. Whats wild about them being called woke because theyre banning people, is the fact they have too as its steam tos. If they dont, steam mods them selves will ban them or delete a post.

It's against steam's terms of service to say that rape, incest and bestiality occurred in the 1400s?

[Machiavelli]

Jester farm

[Huggers]

"I support homosexuality, so the idea that other immoral things are being compared to this thing I don't think is immoral strikes me as silly"
Yeah I bet it does.

[CEO of Cunny]

Originally posted by Dragonirian:

Also age of consent was not a thing back then, do not forget about that too.

Most countries had some norm when it came to age of marriage. It was very stigmatized to have sex before marriage for women. There could be marriage ceremonies that took place at a young age, but co-habitation was usually 12 at the very low end and on average around 14-15.

That being said, if they wanted to be accurate there would be young girls being married. I don't really expect a bigger studio to have the balls to do any of this stuff, but it is ridiculous that they added homosexuality when it would be very rare in such a time. Even worse when the character is pre-made and suddenly swaps sexuality.

[Nirvana]

Originally posted by Huggers:

But they only include the option to be gay. That's weird, isn't it?
All three of things happened more often than homosexuality, but only gay was included.

You have a good point. How come the things included are exactly the things the woke DEI-infested corporations want in the game? It is such a coincidence.
Not all the other gazillion things that also happened in those times.

[BingusDingus]

Originally posted by Huggers:

But they only include the option to be gay. That's weird, isn't it?
All three of things happened more often than homosexuality, but only gay was included.

The game probably does have those things, in the first game if you don't save Teresa she gets raped by Cumens, you can even screw a chicken, the only thing not present in the game was incest.

[lojk]

Originally posted by Huggers:

But they only include the option to be gay. That's weird, isn't it?
All three of things happened more often than homosexuality, but only gay was included.

Bestiality was in the first game.

[lojk]

Originally posted by lojk:

Originally posted by Huggers:

But they only include the option to be gay. That's weird, isn't it?
All three of things happened more often than homosexuality, but only gay was included.

Bestiality and homosexuality was in the first game.

[Rasjel]

Originally posted by Huggers:

Originally posted by Rasjel:

to be clear for you homosexualaty is the same as rape incest and beastality?
its like a vegan would tell me to eat meat is the same as be a canibal...

So you're saying that you would include things in the game, not based on prevalence in history but instead on how you personally feel about the morality of such acts?

Huh, so it's kind of like that Henry's optional gay romance plotline was not based on anything historical at all, (because if it did, rape, incest, bestiality go to the front of the line waaaay before homosexuality would)

but instead it's inclusion (inclusivity) is just the dev's team (or rather their financiers') desire to include homosexuality in the game because they don't find it objectionable?

That's the point I'm making. The desire to include homosexuality is a sign of being tainted by dei/woke/modernism and nothing else. Because any other defense that I've seen used for it is completely shattered when you ask the question "okay, where is the rape then?"

i personaly can totaly live without any gay scenes.
and i bet i will never see this scene. as in any game bevor that has this things its easy to avoid.
so because one thing was included you want the other things too? maybe there are some laws that forbid the showing of this practises. for good reasons.

[Rasjel]

Originally posted by lojk:

Originally posted by Huggers:

But they only include the option to be gay. That's weird, isn't it?
All three of things happened more often than homosexuality, but only gay was included.

Bestiality was in the first game.

not realy true. it was shown but he didnt do it. he just dreamd that because of drugs.