Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i dunno i think it's hilarious, i remember playing divinity 2 with a friend and he kept ending up in various gay sex scenes.
funiest sh/it i have seen.
Then let us all join hands and ensure that gay people shall be forced to watch straight people have sex! Who knows, they may like it and become straight as a result of it.
if i look at a mangled corpse and find that to be repulsive do i have insecurities with my body?
how does that logic work?
lol the anti-wokes have convinced themselves they'll be treated like Alex in A Clockwork Orange or something, good stuff.
I think the insecurity part comes in where someone makes a public statement about it. These are things that are ingrained during our upbringing. I'm fairly certain gay scenes make a lot of people uncomfortable, but most accept that it is not their place to dictate other people's sexual preference.
When you make it sound like it's somehow wrong to be confronted with it, but suggesting heterosexual scenes would be fine by specifically singling out gay content, you risk being perceived as a not very tolerant person. Oftentimes, trying to impose your own moral values on others is rooted in insecurity.
The underlying problem is an ongoing degradation of civility, and I'm sorry to say, in recent history the left shoulders the blame. The left had essentially won the culture war, but by a smaller margin than believed, and then did not bother to account for these ingrained personality traits, pushing a progressive agenda no matter how the minority feels. Remember Clinton's "basket of deplorables"? You gotta be pretty sure of your standing to try and win over voters with that. But that was the reality: You cannot do this, you mustn't say that - period. If you're on the right, what's wrong with you?
In part, people are relieved that they can suddenly say stuff that was hitherto unacceptable. I'm not surprised some are overshooting.
Ideally we would find a middle ground, but the populists have smelled blood, fanning the flames, suggesting anything that owns the libs is a win ... until the pendulum swings back again, or the next cataclysm.
For instance if you want to protray a person who is so powerful and beyond the law, having him be not openly gay, but most people suspect it. The only person to come to mind is historically is Edward II of England.
Basically a guy is so powerful politically and knows it that even the church dare not speak ill of him. That is a strong statement.
If it is just there to be there then there is no point.