Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
KCD was solid. AC has become much less solid over its lifetime.
So, the question becomes: Does a solid start make KCD2 more appealing than a recent history of weaker games?
One autosave file only on PC is such a gamble when so many things can go wrong on PCs that consoles don't have to consider.
(At least, KCD has Saviour Schnapps and multiple autosaves. It seems to me that someone knows how to balance irrevocable consequences against risks of PC gaming, unlike Ubisoft back then.)
At this time, KCD2 is the most tempting for me to break my oath against pre-ordering anything ever. Some other recent games that still remain unpurchased started with high interest at their initial announcement, and I lost all interest before their releases the more I learned. KCD2 has been the opposite with initial meager interest that just kept growing. I still won't pre-order, but I'm confident that I will get the game.
I'm going to assume they're both at maximum skills.
I think it depends on whether the AC character will broadcast the attacks and will be able to block in different ways.
Whoever broadcasts the attacks has a disadvantage. Hank (Henry/Hal) does. It seems that Yasume does not. +1 to Yasume.
Whoever can block in multiple ways has an advantage. Hank can do that. It seems that Yasume does not. +1 to Hank.
Where is the battle happening? That plays into what each character can use during a fight.
Places to hide? +Yasume.
Chaotic battlefield? +Hank.
High ground? Conditional on the kind of high ground and weapon choice.
Yasume will likely be geared towards fighting NPCs that are less-abled and tin-foil, which Hank seems geared to NPCs with nearly the same capabilities as Hank and are tougher (at normal and higher difficulties). This kinda favors Hank if the two are on equal footing. Hank's advantage ends if Yasume can hide and quickly get out-of-reach.
Hank would have no experience against the fabled discipline of a samurai (which is what AC will likely lean toward). This is a big disadvantage for Hank.
So in a one-on-one fight, Hank is the less likely victor than Yasume, but Yasume won't have it easy.
(Canonically, Henry's nickname is Hal. Where I'm from, Hank is the more common nickname for Henry and Hal is the common nickname for Harold.)
If someone can manage a long-lasting wildfire (BG3), that's the best one can hope, but what ignites that is completely unpredictable so far.
But your analysis was a joy to read.
Once a game starts to sell, it seems many people want to buy it even if it's a terrible game. Name dropping a series title is a great way to kick off those initial sales that start an avalanche. KCD has one existing game in its series. AC has plenty, even if many are mediocre or less than. That series name carries a lot of good will even if no longer deserved.
So, it's very possible that Shadows can outsell KCD2, but that is no measure of which game is better and is not a guarantee that Shadows will profit as well as KCD2, either.