Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You prob don't know who sets the price localization. The game is literally more expensive than Black Myth: Wukong and Elden Ring, like what the hell?
and no, its not OP's countries fault, its the developers/publishers setting the price higher than it should be compared to said countries purchasing power.
Thank you
You might need to work on your math. If KCD2 is BRL 299 for you at Steam store it is approx USD 54 and not 70 you mention in the beginning. It is interesting the publisher of KCD2 went with a different price than publishers of the other games you mention - but that is about it... interesting.
I understand that USD 54 is rough taking into account Brazilian GDP per capita, average income etc, but life is rough in poorer countries overall and PC games are not exactly basic life need that need to be affordable to everybody. Note that while players from South American countries are always complaining about regional prices not low enough, players in all EU countries get the same highest price despite some of the poorer EU countries having GDP per capita and average income similar to some South American countries,
Anyone who can afford investing into his PC rig (HW does not have much of a regional pricing, naturally) to keep it good enough to run newly released games can also easily afford to buy several AAA games a year at US/European prices - and getting even slightly better prices than that through regional pricing just makes it even easier. Anyone who cannot afford several AAA games a year at full price also cannot afford to regularily upgrade his PC with the latest HW and thus can only play games several years after release anyway when they are already heavily discounted. Either way, game prices should not be an actual problem for anybody.
A whole lot of yapping to defend poor corporate decisions, and shifting blame onto the consumer.
https://steamdb.info/sub/1109814/
If it has red percentages at the right side, it's objectively overpriced. Regional pricing was a system made to make gaming more accessible and affordable while trying to maximize profits with a proper appealing price point. Don't think of it as discounts but as surcharges. Steam suggested prices are meant to help corporations to make the best estimate of the price at which they will max their profit. Them not following the regional pricing recommendation and overcharging in those regions is proof that they're ignorant and out-of-touch with consumers.
Regional pricing is one of the reasons PC gaming has had such a big expansion in the late-2010s, globally. You're certainly not going to see anyone in second and third world countries buying the game at these price gouging rates. At the end, it's a net loss from potential sales for the corporate, by choosing to overcharge.
No self-respecting gamer has any reason to oppose regional pricing since it's a win-win for all parties involved. VPN hopping? Not a problem since Valve has immensely curbed down on it in the past few years. Grey market key generating in cheaper regions that are sold at a higher price? Easy to counter with geoblocking and restricting keys to particular regions from where they were generated from.
Bruh, the point of this discussion is the regional pricing.
🤡