Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
And then your evidence for it is IGN and Kotaku, two completely left biased companies who jump at any chance to spread whatever misinformation that supports the message.
And no, I'm not clicking your sketchy link.
Sit down.
Well, there's always a danger in a sequel, because of certain expectations. KCD1 was very limited in what Warhorse wanted to do with it. And the ending was a huge lackluster in contrast with what they had planned.
Now they're not crowdfunded, more seasoned and have the technological advantages over their first game. So when they stick to their style and enthusiasm, we'll get an overhauled KCD1 in a shiny new armor with lots of new additions. Soon we know. We're already almost have into 24..
...release will be wonky though XD.
Oh man, i really hope you are wrong here... -.-
Not the point. It is just evidence of who is working on it and then when you see articles about "diversity" and how they are correcting the lack of diversity in the previous game, combined with the numerous statements by developers who advertise this as claiming they have a moral obligation to bring to light all of this politics in games, well... you do the math and the whole claim that this game will be "non-woke" becomes less... of a reality.
Maybe I will be wrong, but... we will see. Though I am sure there will be tons of people accusing that people are wrong about the wokeness, even when it is staring them in the face. Kind of like how BG3 crowds did with the wokeness of that game.
If I am, I will be happily surprised. You know the saying though.. if it looks like a duck, acts like a duck, quacks like a duck... it ain't a horse (well, unless it is the talking Mr. Ed, so there is that).
Random peasant boy becomes knight and meets dozens of significant historical figures (some of them are not white) - REAL ♥♥♥♥?
Curious how the race of characters is always the point all this concern about "historical accuracy" is mysteriously triggered by.. improbable coincidences are fine so long as it's not certain kinds of coincidences
Because there isn't a political movement about random peasant boys becoming a knight being pushed throughout society as a moral imperative?
One is simply a means to insert the player into a historical setting to experience it, the other is to virtue signal modern politics into the history to right some perceived injustice.
One is just an honest tool, the other is a devious motive.