Star Citizen bans 600 players

[Eminem]

Could you imagine some of these players probably spent hundreds of dollars on a space ship only to get banned, lol.


Starfield > Star Citizen

https://www.eurogamer.net/star-citizen-bans-over-600-cheaters

[a sentient mcnugget]

cbiocca님이 먼저 게시:

This forum is for StarField, not Star Citizen.

Star Citizen rocks but I totally agree with you.

[Evergame Studios]

TunnelManiaBrother님이 먼저 게시:

Evergame Studios님이 먼저 게시:

Star Citizen and Starfield are two completly different games, one is MMO and the other is a Singleplayer game, you can't compare the two.
alsoo, there was no ban, players got suspended.
for those here that say you don't want to pay thousands of dollars to gfet a ship, guess what, you don't need to, i been playing the game for years now, all i ever spent was $45 in game, any other ship i got, i worked for in game and used in game money.
that's not including joysticks that i bought, but that's not part of paying to play the game.
Starfield is a good game, but if you really looking at what you can do and what each company accomplished feature/technology wise, it's no contest, Star Citizen is winning big time, not only that, i would imagine that once they are done building the Star Engine, other Studios would line up to use it.

You haven't played Starfield enough (only 88 hours), there's a lot more to do in it than Star Citizen. Also, plenty of moments when playing by yourself in Star Citizen to be bombarded by other players. I'm glad that you only paid 45 to play the game but theirs actual people who have paid thousands and will always be far better than you in the game no matter what, that's what we call a whale's paradise.

That's where you wrong, there's nothing that effect the game itself that players can buy with moneey, that you can't buy in game with in game money, i know a lot of people who don't pay the big money for ships, most go in for the $70 buy ins and that's it. but really there's no difference. i understand that there's a lot to do in Starfield quest wise, but feature wise, there's not, and that's why star citizen have more content.

[momopovich]

Evergame Studios님이 먼저 게시:

TunnelManiaBrother님이 먼저 게시:

You haven't played Starfield enough (only 88 hours), there's a lot more to do in it than Star Citizen. Also, plenty of moments when playing by yourself in Star Citizen to be bombarded by other players. I'm glad that you only paid 45 to play the game but theirs actual people who have paid thousands and will always be far better than you in the game no matter what, that's what we call a whale's paradise.

That's where you wrong, there's nothing that effect the game itself that players can buy with moneey, that you can't buy in game with in game money, i know a lot of people who don't pay the big money for ships, most go in for the $70 buy ins and that's it. but really there's no difference. i understand that there's a lot to do in Starfield quest wise, but feature wise, there's not, and that's why star citizen have more content.

Feature wise SC doesnt have base or ship building tho ? Animals added 1 month ago dont seem particularly fleshed out to me.

As for 1k$+ ship can you actually get them just by playing the game ?

[John]

SC is still a bunch of unfulfilled promises only and in the end nothing more than a tech demo rn... ships don't work properly, even those bought for real money. guys wait for paid ships for years. I play it myself rn and first did not understand why guys called it a scam... and now I know. CIG burns money for nothing. The game has no actual gameplay yet. They are trying to switch it to a PVP shooter from the 80's it seems. Seems they never played D2 or Cyberpunk or somewhat.

It is not possible anymore to get a nice ship with playing the game only !
You have to pledge real money.

That is the reason, why they suspended those players. They made millions of ingame credits with 2-3 unbalanced missions and bought expensive ships with ingame credits only instead of pleding in CIG online-shop.

And... the SC community is very friendly, they gifted credits to players who got broke due to errors or total losses cause of BSOD or CTD, which happens on a daily basis :-D

The main excuse for everything: "don't complain, it's an alpha" ............ ROFL

[chris23162]

Eminem님이 먼저 게시:

Could you imagine some of these players probably spent hundreds of dollars on a space ship only to get banned, lol.


Starfield > Star Citizen

https://www.eurogamer.net/star-citizen-bans-over-600-cheaters

Well yeah of course they did it's a multiplayer game with PVP obviously they will ban cheaters as any multiplayer game does. But starfield is a single player game where cheats and exploits don't impact anyone else's gaming experience but the cheaters.

This entire argument is stupid it's like saying banning a cheater from an international poker tournament is the same as banning a guy from playing poker on his own in his mums basement. If starfield was a multiplayer pvp game then cheaters would have been banned and you can bet your ass they would because they already did it with fallout 76 when they banned cheaters and to get unbanned they had to write an essay on why cheating was bad.

https://www.polygon.com/fallout/2018/12/26/18156278/fallout-76-bans-cheaters-bethesda-customer-support-email-essay

But bethesda was more stupid about it as it not only banned cheaters but also people using mods because well you know you need to pay for those through official bethesda channels and getting them any other way deserves a ban in Todds eyes.

Remember when you compare an apple to an orange you end up looking stupid. So compare the banning of fallout 76 cheaters to starcitizen cheaters as they are both online multiplayer games with pvp with one being made by starfields dev's. Next time you want to be dumb please go and be dumb on your own ok.

[momopovich]

chris23162님이 먼저 게시:

Eminem님이 먼저 게시:

Could you imagine some of these players probably spent hundreds of dollars on a space ship only to get banned, lol.


Starfield > Star Citizen

https://www.eurogamer.net/star-citizen-bans-over-600-cheaters

Well yeah of course they did it's a multiplayer game with PVP obviously they will ban cheaters as any multiplayer game does. But starfield is a single player game where cheats and exploits don't impact anyone else's gaming experience but the cheaters.

This entire argument is stupid it's like saying banning a cheater from an international poker tournament is the same as banning a guy from playing poker on his own in his mums basement. If starfield was a multiplayer pvp game then people would have been banned and you can bet your ass they would because they already did it with fallout 76 when they banned cheaters and to get unbanned they had to write an essay on why cheating was bad.

https://www.polygon.com/fallout/2018/12/26/18156278/fallout-76-bans-cheaters-bethesda-customer-support-email-essay

Remember when you compare an apple to an orange you end up looking stupid. So compare the banning of fallout 76 cheaters to starcitizen cheaters as they are both online multiplayer games with pvp with one being made by starfields dev's. Next time you want to be dumb please go and be dumb on your own ok.

Well yeah except that comparing a sandboxy mmo like SC to a poker tournament is equally stupid

Like in every MMo you can buy IG currency for SC on shady websites (3rd party pay2win model), gold buyers generally never get banned, only bots/exploiters SOMETIMES. MMOs generally benefit from those practices sadly, so the bans are fairly rare (and gold farmers are too resilient anyway)

[zombygunner]

Is that a lot? It seems like a lot. Maybe they deserved it? But wow thats rough.

[momopovich]

zombygunner님이 먼저 게시:

Is that a lot? It seems like a lot. Maybe they deserved it? But wow thats rough.

They were probably selling gold online.

[Odd fella]

No doubt there are star citizen fans defending the bans, even though it could happen to them. Rather like on here the people who defend the $7 mission quest are only going to get hurt from defending it as Bethesda would prefer to break up future expansion DLCs such as Shattered Space into individual missions. They're testing the waters years before they plan to go ahead with this practice.

[ZeroFate]

They werent banned. They were suspended fopr 2 months. Get your facts straight. They also were duping and exploiting the game. No sh-- you get banned or suspended for such actions. Its no surprise to anyone.

Eurogamer is such a rag, half their stories are twisted and unreliable at best.

[Evergame Studios]

momopovich님이 먼저 게시:

Evergame Studios님이 먼저 게시:

That's where you wrong, there's nothing that effect the game itself that players can buy with moneey, that you can't buy in game with in game money, i know a lot of people who don't pay the big money for ships, most go in for the $70 buy ins and that's it. but really there's no difference. i understand that there's a lot to do in Starfield quest wise, but feature wise, there's not, and that's why star citizen have more content.

Feature wise SC doesnt have base or ship building tho ? Animals added 1 month ago dont seem particularly fleshed out to me.

As for 1k$+ ship can you actually get them just by playing the game ?

SC dosn't have base or ship building yet, no. but both are coming. but you looking at one specific feature, i'm talking about all around features, SC have so many compare to Starfield.
And yes any ship that is in game you can get in game, even the ones that cost 1k. the only ones you can't get in game are the ones that are just not in game yet. while people like to spend money on ships that haven't come out yet, once they are out and in the game, you would be able to get them with in game currency.

[AuddieD]

Evergame Studios님이 먼저 게시:

SC dosn't have base or ship building yet, no. but both are coming.

Soon (TM). In a decade or so. Maybe.

[Evergame Studios]

AuddieD님이 먼저 게시:

Evergame Studios님이 먼저 게시:

SC dosn't have base or ship building yet, no. but both are coming.

Soon (TM). In a decade or so. Maybe.

you have no idea on the speed of progress now, it's not 10 years ago, things are coming up pretty fast at the moment

[Skirnir]

Eminem님이 먼저 게시:

Could you imagine some of these players probably spent hundreds of dollars on a space ship only to get banned, lol.


Starfield > Star Citizen

https://www.eurogamer.net/star-citizen-bans-over-600-cheaters

Sir .. this is Star-FIELD .. not star-CITIZEN
I think you're lost.

[Malakie]

Eminem님이 먼저 게시:

Could you imagine some of these players probably spent hundreds of dollars on a space ship only to get banned, lol.


Starfield > Star Citizen

https://www.eurogamer.net/star-citizen-bans-over-600-cheaters

About time too. Hackers, toxic players, cheaters ... all banned. And they won't be the last. Took CIG long enough to finally do something about it.