Moving from a 3070Ti to a 4070 Ti for this one!

[Chef_423]

I dont think I have ever been so hyped for a game to release!

[Guyver]

Laughs in 7900XTX

[V3ntilator]

diMaggio a écrit :

Satan's_First a écrit :

I have a 3080 12GB Suprim, was tempted to get a 4090 but decided to wait for the 5000 series instead.
Worth an upgrade if its required for this game alone

Yeah, I'm holding off as well for now. In my case I'd have to get a new mainboard that supports the 4000 series, so I'll probably just buy a completely new system.
But I'm not in the mood to get a completely new system yet.

You shouldn't buy a new system before 50xxx generation of GPU's is out.

3070 TI won't be outdated anytime soon, and 3070 will be great for Starfield. No need to worry.
What CPU you have for your 3070 matters for this game than a 4070.

[diMaggio]

V3ntilator a écrit :

diMaggio a écrit :

Yeah, I'm holding off as well for now. In my case I'd have to get a new mainboard that supports the 4000 series, so I'll probably just buy a completely new system.
But I'm not in the mood to get a completely new system yet.

You shouldn't buy a new system before 50xxx generation of GPU's is out.

3070 TI won't be outdated anytime soon, and 3070 will be great for Starfield. No need to worry.
What CPU you have for your 3070 matters for this game than a 4070.

Yeah I'm not in a hurry to upgrade.
I have a 2080-ti, which is still very good for most games, it's only in some games and with some higher settings that it comes to its limits.

I'm also frequently using userbenchmark.com to compare the effective speed increase of upgrades, as well as the bang-to-buck ratio of new cards.

[Bandy]

diMaggio a écrit :

I'm also frequently using userbenchmark.com to compare the effective speed increase of upgrades, as well as the bang-to-buck ratio of new cards.

I understand interest, it's a pro-sumer hobby after all, but gotta know professionals provide the best most objective benchmarks: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html

[diMaggio]

Bandy a écrit :

diMaggio a écrit :

I'm also frequently using userbenchmark.com to compare the effective speed increase of upgrades, as well as the bang-to-buck ratio of new cards.

I understand interest, it's a pro-sumer hobby after all, but gotta know professionals provide the best most objective benchmarks: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html

Oh yeah, I only use the benchmark site as a general indicator. If I were to become interested enough in an upgrade I'd make a deep dive for sure.

[g0jira]

i just wonder if my 2070 super will be enough to play without hiccups.

[L3wt]

g0jira a écrit :

i just wonder if my 2070 super will be enough to play without hiccups.

Depends entirely on your target resolution and graphics fidelity.

[SHREDDER]

The most demanding games now need 12 GB VRAM for max settings 1440p 60 fps . For those who still have graphics cards with less than 10 gb vram it is better to get a 16 or more GB VRAM card than a 12 gb. Get a RX 7900XT or RTX 4080. Also tell us what is your psu and case?

[SHREDDER]

FeilDOW a écrit :

SHREDDER a écrit :

there is no need to change cpu. I got mine rx 6700xt in 2021 and since then i run evrything maxed 1440p 60 fps andi have ryzen 7 1700 which is a cpu from 2017!

A CPU you need to upgrade to enjoy much higher lows in this gen games, like TLOU or Survivor and likely Starfield.

aND as i said my next ugpgrade ill be cpu ram and motherboared yes but not now because i still run all games maxed 1440p 60 fps. I will do it when it wil be needed.

[Chef_423]

The Gent a écrit :

Why? there's no point. This is the same graphics engine as Fallout 4. So if whateve you have now can play that at good fps, you will be perfectly fine with what you have. I have a 6700XT and a 3800X...if you dont have 8 cores by now idk what you are doing. and the 6700XT runs Cybershit max settings 60fps 1440p fine. so if it can handle that it can def handle Starfield.

That's what I was thinking....thank you for that input.

[Chef_423]

SHREDDER a écrit :

The most demanding games now need 12 GB VRAM for max settings 1440p 60 fps . For those who still have graphics cards with less than 10 gb vram it is better to get a 16 or more GB VRAM card than a 12 gb. Get a RX 7900XT or RTX 4080. Also tell us what is your psu and case?

PSU is the EVGA 1000 P2 (a beast) those 1000 clean watts leaves alot of upgrade room.

[SHREDDER]

Chef_423 a écrit :

SHREDDER a écrit :

The most demanding games now need 12 GB VRAM for max settings 1440p 60 fps . For those who still have graphics cards with less than 10 gb vram it is better to get a 16 or more GB VRAM card than a 12 gb. Get a RX 7900XT or RTX 4080. Also tell us what is your psu and case?

PSU is the EVGA 1000 P2 (a beast) those 1000 clean watts leaves alot of upgrade room.

Yesi was very lucky to change psu when i got the rx 6700xt red devil as it needs 700 wartpsu or better and i hav e a 750 watt psu that i got i n2016. Then with 1000 watt it will be ok even for rx 7900xt. Get one of the two either the rx 7900xt or rtx 4080. the cheapest of the two that you can find.

[BEEP!]

I upgraded to a RX6800 just a few months back and just yesterday I installed my new 5800x3d so I'm ready.

[Haziza]

dazza0511 a écrit :

That upgrade is not worth imo. All of the 40 series cards are a waste of money, it's better to wait for 50 series.

6000 series will be even better!

[AdahnGorion]

SHREDDER a écrit :

The most demanding games now need 12 GB VRAM for max settings 1440p 60 fps . For those who still have graphics cards with less than 10 gb vram it is better to get a 16 or more GB VRAM card than a 12 gb. Get a RX 7900XT or RTX 4080. Also tell us what is your psu and case?

They are not demanding, they are unoptimized.
Some of them have been fixed.

H:L with High settings and RT on with 1440p does not even use 6 gb Vram for me.