Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Yeah it's ridiculous how often legitimate criticisms of games are brushed aside by developers and enthusiasts alike.
If you think I'm an alt, that's your problem, not mine. My criticisms stand regardless of whether you misattribute them to someone else.
What exactly are you laughing about?
But don't just take my word for it. Starfield holds the dubious honor of being the most refunded game of all time. And if that weren't enough, the DLC fares equally poorly, scoring a paltry 26% on reviews. If you're looking for a compelling sci-fi RPG experience, look elsewhere.
I think it's safe to say the only reason anyone is still talking about Starfield is because of how spectacularly it failed to live up to expectations. It's like watching a train wreck – everyone wants to rubberneck.
Maybe you should manage your expectations better then, because SF was exactly what I was expecting, it's a well made loot/shooter with rpg elements with some cool ship building and outposts.
I didn't allow myself to get self hyped into thinking this was going to be a space flight sim.