I love the unparalleled freedom of exploration in this game!

[765]

https://imgur.com/a/Zl3hzD2

[dcbobo]

Originally posted by ULTRA:

Originally posted by dcbobo:

yet, I don't know a single "game pass"user that dislikes the game.

In fact, Starfield is rated the equivalent of a 57.5% on Game Pass, so generally speaking the notion that Game Pass users like it less is correct, although if it had that score on here then you can be assured that juskom95 would be painting it as, "the majority of users like it!"

Mostly all this supports about Game Pass vs. Steam is that people already have decided how much they like they game before they put down money for it.

No it doesn't. I think the point I'm trying to make is the "scores" are meaningless. None of those users that I know who love Starfield have left reviews. In fact, the only data that scores support, is that most people don't give a ♥♥♥♥ about them enough to leave one themself...

[ULTRA]

Originally posted by dcbobo:

Originally posted by ULTRA:

In fact, Starfield is rated the equivalent of a 57.5% on Game Pass, so generally speaking the notion that Game Pass users like it less is correct, although if it had that score on here then you can be assured that juskom95 would be painting it as, "the majority of users like it!"

Mostly all this supports about Game Pass vs. Steam is that people already have decided how much they like they game before they put down money for it.

No it doesn't. I think the point I'm trying to make is the "scores" are meaningless. None of those users that I know who love Starfield have left reviews. In fact, the only data that scores support, is that most people don't give a ♥♥♥♥ about them enough to leave one themself...

Oh yes, the scores are meaningless, but the reason that the Game Pass scores are lower is because people on Game Pass feel this is a $10 game and the people on Steam feel this is a $70 game.

[Kiwachu]

Originally posted by Blackcobalt:

I consider Starfield as a mini sandbox game. Lots of fun to be had.

What's your opinion on the false advertising they used to sell the game?

[juskom95]

Originally posted by Kiwa:

Originally posted by Blackcobalt:

I consider Starfield as a mini sandbox game. Lots of fun to be had.

What's your opinion on the false advertising they used to sell the game?

Cite the specific false advertising.

For it to actually be false advertising it would have to be an ADVERTISED feature, not something you hoped for.

Cite the article, press release or hell even the screenshot!

[dcbobo]

Originally posted by ULTRA:

Originally posted by dcbobo:

No it doesn't. I think the point I'm trying to make is the "scores" are meaningless. None of those users that I know who love Starfield have left reviews. In fact, the only data that scores support, is that most people don't give a ♥♥♥♥ about them enough to leave one themself...

Oh yes, the scores are meaningless, but the reason that the Game Pass scores are lower is because people on Game Pass feel this is a $10 game and the people on Steam feel this is a $70 game.

huh?
think about that logic, for $10 this isn't a good game... But it's better if you paid more for it? Wouldn't it make sense that being available for $10-15 on gamepass people would be rating it much higher?

[Mightylink]

Everyone arguing about boundries but nobody talking about having open cities now. You can walk anywhere in New Atlantis without using the transit and even explore the planet without a loading screen. This is the first Bethesda game to do that but everyone is too busy complaining about loading screens in space.

[juskom95]

Originally posted by Mightylink:

Everyone arguing about boundries but nobody talking about having open cities now. You can walk anywhere in New Atlantis without using the transit and even explore the planet without a loading screen, but everyones complaining about loading screens in space...

Yeah. I didn't realize that about New Atlantis (or that you could just . . . leave the city, Akila is the same way!) until I wandered off during a quest one day.

[Mathias Giovanni]

Originally posted by White Knight:

I'm not sure when I last slept? Since I got this game, I haven't stopped playing it.

What strikes me as being peculiar is that if a longtime player of Fallout and Elder Scrolls, etc. is having so much fun, then this forum is pretty much useless. The hate and vitriol does not match up with the experience of playing the game.

Agreed.

Game is awesome. No one is forcing them to click the fast travel buttons. They can just get up from their pilot seat and walk to the location they want to go. Or choose the mission location, launch into space, pull up the starmap that you have to do in nearly every space game I've played, pick the destination and jump to it. Then they can land and get out of the seat.

They don't have to fast travel. Worst mistake Bethesda made was adding convenience for these people. They need a mod that removes fast travel options so they actually learn they can go from place to place.

[White Knight]

Originally posted by Aramis:

Kinda true. The game does not evidence hate and vitriol. Instead, it exhibits dull and bland derivative dialogue and dull repetitive game play.

Compared to what... exactly?

It's a video game. All video games are ♥♥♥♥. It's a sad fact that I have unfortunately witnessed all of my life. Video games suck.

I don't know why that is a rule, but it seems to be the norm.

Please (and I am stabbing myself with a steak-knife for asking this stupid question as we speak) let me know what video game isn't imperfect, doesn't have glitches, doesn't have problems, didn't start out as crap that eventually got patched out... blah, blah, effing blah.

Short version - stfu and gain some perspective. In a world of ♥♥♥♥, it makes no sense to cry about seeing a peanut.