Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I like how big Starfield is and that it can be filled with more content. I enjoy the scale and would like to see them fill that in with more generated content rather than focused content.
What if it never got filled in though?
No.
Improved outpost building alone would be enough to make any "empty" planetary area relevant.
I mean, you visibly bought the game and got nothing out of it while others are enjoying it. That means you're projecting
it is indeed better than where it started
no
That sentence makes no sense did you realize that ?
Sorry if that wasnt clear, but that wasnt my intention either
Still curious about what you're referring to with the "130$ price tag for one planet" since base game +DLC cost 100$, but at the same time Im not that interested by your potential answers