Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
I’d put a big emphasis on #1 there, I’m guessing Microsoft expects a big Bethesda game at least once every 3 years now. TES, Fallout, possibly Starfield.
it did that, and it did well on xbox, but many who paid full price feel shortchanged -- they've come to expect better from this studio, bugs are one thing but lost potential is another.
MS would be wise to support this title to what it could be, Brand image matters.
But they won't be Beth anymore.
Which now that I think on that more it's probably a good thing lol
Could be, they do seem like they could use a shake up. I think Starfield is fine, had potential, but came off a bit dull overall. It wasn’t a home run, they barely managed to leg out a double.
The correct terminology would be.
Microsoft restructure Xbox Game Studio´s ZeniMAX. (Bethesda is a subsidiary of ZeniMAX, whom is a subsidiary of Xbox Game studios, whom are a division under Microsoft.
I had a read of the transcript. Seems like she's talking about women being a potential new market, and then speaking about games/devices which could be addictive like an arcade with actual prizes. The devices themselves can be addictive and behaviour altering, especially with children -- but certainly not limited to them with social media and everything else. I sound like some grandpa probably but everyone walking around glued to a screen is kinda weird.
I hope she's not some kind of 'creative director' because it was some of the most soulless crap I've ever read, but hey I guess that's their world. I don't plan on playing any arcade stuff on my phone, most of the time I don't even know where it is when I'm at home.
The title of the article is referring to Bethesda Softworks/Zenimax, the publishing arm. Not Bethesda Game Studios, the developer. It’s amazing this still confuses people.
No, it's not the best thing for people to lose their jobs.
it's just a shame and sad.
on the other hand, the community that buys game titles that are expensive and not in good condition is not the best and leads us to situations that we don't want to have in a game title.
so what is preferable after all? nobody wants to lose their job and nobody wants to buy something that is not ready.
in which case I would tell them to just focus on a good job.
Fair enough. Fraid I'm not up to date on old todd, though some people round here talk about him a fair bit. I'm obviously missing the point, so why not just say what's on your mind.
Typically the head of anything is like this -- what is it that will happen?
edit: -- seems a bit of a jump, doesn't it?
She does report to Xbox Studio Head Matt Booty though who oversees ZeniMax and a few others. These studio closers were announced by Booty. And he reports to Xbox head Phil Spencer, who reports to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. So a few layers removed from just being able to do whatever she wants.
I wouldn't trust MS, and they for sure pushed the launch and were probably behind some other additions. If they do that crap under the B name, they'll just task a studio they bought and renamed. We're talking about sub of sub of sub into infinity, but it is MS gaming (I think that's the new name) and BGS is still a studio under it. It gets confusing but the ones they closed were all ones they bought and gave the name to (I think, feel free to fact check)