Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
According to their criticisms, apparently, the reason Starfield isn't interesting for some people must be the fact that Todd is a white heterosexual male (maybe even an extreme Mormon, since you can be polygamous in this game yet only have stupidly unsexy dancers) and the game doesn't have a ton of horny gay sex, non-binary NPCs, and genital customization options in the game.
SF was made where woke agenda's dominated the creation process.
SF is a woke abomination, but not because it is full of agenda banging NPC's. Its a dead empty boring game because of it.
BG3 is full to the brim with "Adult" content, sex, violence, gore, and the rest, with well written companions (even if they are super randy) and a good story, exploring is fun, finding gear is fun, leveling up is fun.
Now I suspect the difference of these two things is going to go straight over your head.
I personally think 5e DnD is an oversimplified travesty of a game system. But they used it to make a game that is fun, exciting and engaging even with the agenda pushing found inside it.
So it is a bit weird to hear all the claims of how its brave or anything like that, since its not brave and it is not innovative.
Starfield has destroyed Bethesda's credibility on its own merits, on its failure to be an entertaining game.
I see a lot of people saying that Elder Scroll 6, will be the last chance.
I think Bethesda, has had enough last chances.
I think Bethesda will with everything it is doing in the mods scene upset a lot more people real soon.
Every time I read someone bring up Cyberpunk 2077 in a Starfield context, I just sort groan.
Oh jeez here we go someone is going to try to compare trashfield to super awesome Cyberpunk game.
Here how about a video,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80R73vFPFG8&ab_channel=DownwardThrust
Fallout 76, bad game
Redfall 2, bad game
Starfield, bad game
Todd and company worked on all of those.
So
The Elder Scrolls 6, bad game.
All the real competitors of Bethesda do way better games than they do.
Red Dead 2, awesome game
Cyberpunk 2077, awesome game
Baldurs Gate 3, awesome game
Honestly it would take effort to find games that are in the low league of Starfield that are not as good as Starfield.
you seem to not pick up on the major difference tho.. one feels natural in the game and in the other it just fills like "oh don't forget to add that to check the checkbox" thats the issue...
no you can't... you can only marry one person, you have to break up with the person before you "commit" to someone else.
Thank you for further clarifying my point. That shows the DEI scores for Bethesda and Larian Studios are actually fair enough.
And for the bigamy part:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starfield/comments/16cr1q4/married_to_andreja_and_sarah_at_the_same_time/
Wow you can only do it with one character and you have to use "manipulation" "slow clap" totally prove you point that starfield supports polygamy...
pro tip if you have to manipulate your partner its isn't a polygamous relationship more like a controlling relationship that the other person should run from as fast as the can, nthing screams red flag more then manipulation
"No didn't need manipulate as you can persuade her with a possibility of failing it. Manipulation seemed to be a guarantee."
"im married to sam & sarah"
"I've also married Sam Coe since and Sarah never got angry and Sam wasn't bothered that I was married to Sarah. Currently romancing Barrett to have all 4 companions married, well 3 now but I won't spoil that for you."
ya the one character i was referring to was Sarah cause ever post i seen like that has always been with Sarah and another so i just marked it as more of a bug on Sarah part then anything else if im honest... butt if you can do it with everyone and not having Sarah then im ok with being wrong means im just going to marry everyone except Sarah.
and btw persuading is basically manipulation. its just a nicer way of saying it and more socially acceptable.
The third quote points out that Sam Coe doesn't care either.
Controlling polygamous relationships are also polygamous relationships. Genuinely, controlling is the very common in polygamous relationships irl. Also, it is only for Andereja. The others don't care bigamy at all.
Nobody cares
That's extremely subjective. While F76 was broken and lacking engaging content, I find Starfield perfectly playable and engaging. The disappointment comes mostly from people who heard "Skyrim in space" and not listened to anything else. About a year or two ago I heard the same complaints about Skyrim btw: lacking depth, poorly written quests. mediocre combat, Oblivion/Morrowind was better, etc. Now, suddenly, it's the standard for their games. Odd that...
SF fails at representing HETEROSEXUALS.
The entire world is bisexual. FACT.
Ok, so DEI is quite literally a lie when somebody makes the claim that SF is INCLUSIVE across the board. It fails miserably to include the truth of heterosexuals.
Here is an idealistic image of HETEROSEXUAL:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/brain-wise/201802/the-dopamine-seeking-reward-loop