"Starfield's official modding tools MAY soon be entering beta in late spring".....

[RacistRonnie]

Creation Kit 2.0 will be out end of 2024 if you are lucky They have now pushed it out multiple times, and currently they plan to enter Beta "soon". Technically Todd Howard didn't lie when he said Creation Kit to be out in 2024.....he just failed to mention that it was only going to be Beta.

Pack your bags, go to sleep.

https://gamerant.com/starfield-creation-kit-modding-tools-verified-creators-beta/

[RacistRonnie]

Even the fanbois are admitting they quit Starfield and it sucks

https://www.reddit.com/r/Starfield/comments/1axg1ff/looks_like_there_will_be_closed_testing_of/utm_source=embedv2&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_content=whitespace&embed_host_url=https://gamerant.com/starfield-creation-kit-modding-tools-verified-creators-beta/

[Zmidponk]

Your own link suggests that the full release of this could be out by spring, so you're actually not even right going by your own source.

[RacistRonnie]

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

Your own link suggests that the full release of this could be out by spring, so you're actually not even right going by your own source.

If you truly think that Beta testing will take 30 days, you're insane.

Their statement "Mod support COULD be released as early as spring" is the same as when they said "Mod support COULD be release as late fall." or "Mod support COULD be released as early as end of 2023."

[Zmidponk]

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

Your own link suggests that the full release of this could be out by spring, so you're actually not even right going by your own source.

If you truly think that Beta testing will take 30 days, you're insane.

This is your own chosen source saying that. If they're wrong, why are you using them as a source?

[RacistRonnie]

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

If you truly think that Beta testing will take 30 days, you're insane.

This is your own chosen source saying that. If they're wrong, why are you using them as a source?

It was the writer of the article who made an opinion that they "think" it COULD be out as early as spring. That literally means nothing.

[Zmidponk]

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

This is your own chosen source saying that. If they're wrong, why are you using them as a source?

It was the writer of the article who made an opinion that they "think" it COULD be out as early as spring. That literally means nothing.

So you're saying that the evidence that you, yourself have presented is utterly meaningless. So why should we believe anything you say, when even your own evidence is, by your own admission, weak as hell?

[RacistRonnie]

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

It was the writer of the article who made an opinion that they "think" it COULD be out as early as spring. That literally means nothing.

So you're saying that the evidence that you, yourself have presented is utterly meaningless. So why should we believe anything you say, when even your own evidence is, by your own admission, weak as hell?

I am basing it on an educated guess rather than sucking up to a Corporation that probably pays them for their articles.

Beta form of any project of this scale tends to take time. I am literally using my own judgement and experience in life. I've NEVER see a game/engine/modding kit enter a "Beta" phase and be finished with days or months.

This is why our world is messed up. People like you read opinions by people who are paid and take it as fact. This has been the biggest problem in our society for a long time. You literally believe "Authoritative Sources".

[Zmidponk]

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

So you're saying that the evidence that you, yourself have presented is utterly meaningless. So why should we believe anything you say, when even your own evidence is, by your own admission, weak as hell?

I am basing it on an educated guess rather than sucking up to a Corporation that probably pays them for their articles.

Beta form of any project of this scale tends to take time. I am literally using my own judgement and experience in life. I've NEVER see a game/engine/modding kit enter a "Beta" phase and be finished with days or months.

This is why our world is messed up. People like you read opinions by people who are paid and take it as fact. This has been the biggest problem in our society for a long time. You literally believe "Authoritative Sources".

So your evidence is 'Trust me bro, what I'm saying is right - even though it disagrees with the link I provided'. Not exactly convincing.

[Mooman]

I'm fairly certain the OP is trying to be ironic quoting Gamerant.

Just type in a search engine "Gamerant plagiarism" and you'll see...

That website often just trawls Reddit posts and passes off what it found as 'news'. It is a highly unreliable source of factual information.

Others posting threads with the same links shows just how ignorant some are around here... Due diligence is important in being trusted and useful.

[lfcxy]

Originally posted by Zmidponk:

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

If you truly think that Beta testing will take 30 days, you're insane.

This is your own chosen source saying that. If they're wrong, why are you using them as a source?

Opinion is not evidence.

When the authors of a paper contradict their conclusions and the data they present, it is obvious that the latter should be believed.

[lfcxy]

Originally posted by Mooman:

I'm fairly certain the OP is trying to be ironic quoting Gamerant.

Just type in a search engine "Gamerant plagiarism" and you'll see...

That website often just trawls Reddit posts and passes off what it found as 'news'. It is a highly unreliable source of factual information.

Others posting threads with the same links shows just how ignorant some are around here... Due diligence is important in being trusted and useful.

The more critical issue is that CK2 will not revive the mod community, as CK1 also didn't do that. So even OP is grossly over-optimistic to the point of believing that the release of CK2 makes sense, which is indeed a pernicious effect of relying on the "information" provided by these media outlets, but not solved in the way you suggest.

[RacistRonnie]

Originally posted by Mooman:

I'm fairly certain the OP is trying to be ironic quoting Gamerant.

Just type in a search engine "Gamerant plagiarism" and you'll see...

That website often just trawls Reddit posts and passes off what it found as 'news'. It is a highly unreliable source of factual information.

Others posting threads with the same links shows just how ignorant some are around here... Due diligence is important in being trusted and useful.

^This. Most articles these days are just garbage or paid pieces of propaganda.

[Damedius]

Originally posted by RacistRonnie:

^This. Most articles these days are just garbage or paid pieces of propaganda.

"Propaganda" by Edward Bernays should be required reading in order to vote.

[Call Sign: Raven]

Gamerant is one of the poorest sites one could source.

[Caolán_The_Wolf]

Originally posted by Call Sign: Raven:

Gamerant is one of the poorest sites one could source.

wild how you didnt mention that in vlad's thread