Playing Star Citizen Reminded me How Good Starfield is

[xShapelessx]

Holy *****.

I am running a higher end system with a 7800 x 3d and was dipping as low as 30 fps on medium in 1440 in Star Citizen (while it looked terrible)

Whats the point in all those systems like free roaming flying etc, if you're pulling 40 fps on a 3500 dollar rig? It's literally a joke. 10 years in alpha and you people bash Starfield? lmao. Starfield is at least a competent (to some amazing) space shooter/rpg with non linear elements. I'd much rather continue playing Starfield than waste any time at 40 fps in Star Citizen. maybe once they make it playable itll be worth sinking time into.

Play Starfield instead.

BTW ITS BEEN IN EARLY ACCESS ALPHA FOR 12 YEARS LMAO GET REAL GUYS

[Sistermatic™]

We have some rather obvious Star Citizen shills here... they'll be along soon enough to voice their displeasure at your observations - by dissing Starfield

3..2..1..

[A. Silvermane]

https://youtu.be/7m1h0Hf5uMs?si=-6n9Z4F0q5Ysvrga

[vonbleak]

Star Citizen is still in Alpha and wont hit 1.0 for a few more years at least... Im sure if you played an early Alpha of Starfield a few years ago it would have been pretty rough too haha...

Wait until Star Citizen is actually finished before comparing it to other finished games... That makes sense right...?

[CurrySpirals]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Star Citizen is still in Alpha and wont hit 1.0 for a few more years at least... Im sure if you played an early Alpha of Starfield a few years ago it would have been pretty rough too haha... :cozybethesda:

Wait until Star Citizen is actually finished before comparing it to other finished games... That makes sense right...? :cozybethesda:

If they charge people money it’s fair game to critique it.

[✠Deser✞🅵☣⚔⚔♏✠]

Originally posted by xShapelessx:

Holy *****.

I am running a higher end system with a 7800 x 3d and was dipping as low as 30 fps on medium in 1440 in Star Citizen (while it looked terrible)

Whats the point in all those systems like free roaming flying etc, if you're pulling 40 fps on a 3500 dollar rig? It's literally a joke. 10 years in alpha and you people bash Starfield? lmao. Starfield is at least a competent (to some amazing) space shooter/rpg with non linear elements. I'd much rather continue playing Starfield than waste any time at 40 fps in Star Citizen. maybe once they make it playable itll be worth sinking time into.

Play Starfield instead.

You're using the card Starfield was made for lol, I'm running Starfield on a 3060 RTX in 4K and I had to cast a spell on this game before it would run like Fallout 4. Without casting a spell my game barely gets above 29 FPS on medium, with the Master spell casting perk I get 85 to 109 fps second.

When people get a card like a 4090 or 7800, the first thing they do is take everything up to Ultra. I haven't played Star Citizen yet, waiting for SQ42, but I imagine they have ray tracing, just saying if that's on that's atleast 30 fps gone.

Edit: I also want to add when Starfield first came out I had a 6800 and this game never went below 60 FPS in 4K. But I had to return it because I couldn't stop it from freaking out when watching Amazon and Paramount, it would constantly change the resolution, so yea Starfield was made for AMD.

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by CurrySpirals:

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Star Citizen is still in Alpha and wont hit 1.0 for a few more years at least... Im sure if you played an early Alpha of Starfield a few years ago it would have been pretty rough too haha...

Wait until Star Citizen is actually finished before comparing it to other finished games... That makes sense right...?

If they charge people money it’s fair game to critique it.

We all know its early access... So critique it as that, its not a finished game yet, pretty simple... Compare it to other early access games... Or you are just being unfair on purpose just to make a point which is kinda weak...

[xShapelessx]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Star Citizen is still in Alpha and wont hit 1.0 for a few more years at least... Im sure if you played an early Alpha of Starfield a few years ago it would have been pretty rough too haha...

Wait until Star Citizen is actually finished before comparing it to other finished games... That makes sense right...?

Alpha for 12 years? k

[CurrySpirals]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Originally posted by CurrySpirals:

If they charge people money it’s fair game to critique it.

We all know its early access... So critique it as that, its not a finished game yet, pretty simple... Compare it to other early access games... Or you are just being unfair on purpose just to make a point which is kinda weak... :cozybethesda:

That isn’t how I make my purchasing decisions, I don’t give a free pass to early access games. They are in competition with every other game out there to get my money.

[Vlad 254]

Originally posted by xShapelessx:

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Star Citizen is still in Alpha and wont hit 1.0 for a few more years at least... Im sure if you played an early Alpha of Starfield a few years ago it would have been pretty rough too haha...

Wait until Star Citizen is actually finished before comparing it to other finished games... That makes sense right...?

Alpha for 12 years? k

I know right and thanks for calling it out.

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by Vlad 254:

Originally posted by xShapelessx:

Alpha for 12 years? k

I know right and thanks for calling it out.

Yeah totally - The dev time is insane and slow for sure... But its actually made alot of progress in the last 12 months or so, so at least its progressing nicely now...

I like Starfield and Star Citizen - Is that allowed...?

[utahcowboy]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Originally posted by Vlad 254:

I know right and thanks for calling it out.

Yeah totally - The dev time is insane and slow for sure... But its actually made alot of progress in the last 12 months or so, so at least its progressing nicely now...

I like Starfield and Star Citizen - Is that allowed...?

Yes it certainly is. Personally, I gave up on Star Citizen ever actually finishing years ago. Chris Roberts was my hero developer back when Wing Commander came out, but him leaving projects early or unfinished some times and then the seemingly never ending dev time on SC has caused me to loose faith in his ability as a game maker. I hope SC gets finished, especially for the sake of those who enjoy it, like yourself, but I'm not crossing my fingers.

[Call Sign: Raven]

I've been wondering about Star Citizen, I didn't even know it was still in production. It honestly looks like snake oil. I don't trust that it will ever be complete.

[HeyYou]

Originally posted by utahcowboy:

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Yeah totally - The dev time is insane and slow for sure... But its actually made alot of progress in the last 12 months or so, so at least its progressing nicely now...

I like Starfield and Star Citizen - Is that allowed...?

Yes it certainly is. Personally, I gave up on Star Citizen ever actually finishing years ago. Chris Roberts was my hero developer back when Wing Commander came out, but him leaving projects early or unfinished some times and then the seemingly never ending dev time on SC has caused me to loose faith in his ability as a game maker. I hope SC gets finished, especially for the sake of those who enjoy it, like yourself, but I'm not crossing my fingers.

Chris Roberts is absolutely notorious for 'scope creep' in games he works on. It has cost him at least one job..... He works on a feature, until he finds some other 'shiny feature' to work on, and leaves a string of half finished projects behind him. Star Citizen is an epic demonstration of that.... Look at what the original goal was, back when it first started, then, look at what the goals are now... There is some rather significant creep there....

Star Citizen will never be 'finished'. I would be surprised if it even makes into Beta. Chris has been able to milk this project for 12 years. What would prompt him to want to stop now.... He has raised what? 600 million dollars? And folks were poking Starfield for spending 2/3rds of that... At least SF is a real game that you can play. SC is still just a fancy tech demo.

[Vlad 254]

Why wouldn't it be allowed vonbleak? You weren't being called out for liking anything, you were trying to pass Star Citizen off as being in Early Access totally ignoring that it's been out since 2012,

Here's your quote

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Originally posted by CurrySpirals:

If they charge people money it’s fair game to critique it.

We all know its early access... So critique it as that, its not a finished game yet, pretty simple... Compare it to other early access games... Or you are just being unfair on purpose just to make a point which is kinda weak...

I'd say your reply was what was actually weak but that would be putting it kindly so I'll refriain.

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by Vlad 254:

Why wouldn't it be allowed vonbleak? You weren't being called out for liking anything, you were trying to pass Star Citizen off as being in Early Access totally ignoring that it's been out since 2012,

Here's your quote

Originally posted by vonbleak:

We all know its early access... So critique it as that, its not a finished game yet, pretty simple... Compare it to other early access games... Or you are just being unfair on purpose just to make a point which is kinda weak...

I'd say your reply was what was actually weak but that would be putting it kindly so I'll refriain.

Star Citizen is an Alpha... and is far from finished... No one disputes that... Critique it all you want but its clearly unfinished... Its literally an Early Access game atm