Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So you have no counter argument.
But… considering the level of this thread and probably its author, I’ll just offer to say - “OMG, reach piples don’t knoes where to spend moneys!!”
Do you have any scale of what that is in terms of dev houses?
Or are you just comparing it to your salary?
Bethesda was "pocket change", in comparison.
It was actually cheaper to buy ZeniMax than a Finnish mobile game company.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1248063/biggest-video-game-industry-acquisitions/
8.6 billion for Supercell by Tencent. Depressing really, but mobile games are a huge business.
Also, they needed more first party developers and IP for Game Pass. They bought a whole lot more than BGS and Starfield for their $7 Billion. There’s a list of developers here - https://www.ign.com/articles/microsofts-zenimax-acquisition-officially-complete-bethesda-now-a-part-of-xbox
Microsoft doesn't have leadership that knows how to manage studios. They throw money at problems but money alone doesn't always fix things.
Aside from Windows and Office being OS monopolies Microsoft really sucks at everything else they do.