This is Why Astraunaut were not bored going to the moon!

[Fulguro Geek YouTube]

The reason Astraunaut was not bored going to the moon even if the moon was empty... the Reason is that they had no loading screens.
they had the tech to do it seamless from earth to moon in 1 sequence.

Imagine how outdated your engine is Bethesda, they had a better game engine back in 1969!

[Darth Revan]

seamless transissions from planet to orbit and the other way around is not needed at all and the absence of it has nothing to do with the engine, it was a design decission, they thought that it would not be that important to thair player base and thus spend thair develpoment ressources in other areas instead.

[Dagtag]

here we go again with the misinformation. no, it has nothing to do with the engine being "outdated"... clearly not someone who works with engines huh?

[lumina]

Or because they were strapped to large rockets that flung them into space in a small capsule that can't really stand up to many of the dangers of space. When your cheeks are clinched for five days straight wondering if you are going to die, you tend not to get too bored.

[Jᴧgᴧ]

At least they had Tang to drink along the way, that probably made the boring landscape far more entertaining. Of course, there was always the imminent threat of death, which we don't get sitting behind keyboards.. but I digress.

[Liquid Inc]

and this bothers you why OP?

Wow there's loading screens in a game!!!! Such bad, much wow! /S

You trolls really can't think of anything new, can you?

[Mephitic]

This? This is the best you've got? You should have paid more attention in troll school.

[potato]

Originally posted by Fulguro Geek YouTube:

he reason Astraunaut was not bored going to the moon even if the moon was empty... the Reason is that they had no loading screens.

[AdahnGorion]

Those Bethesda Community Manager´s failed to even get this part right.....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6119059/First-man-orbit-moon-says-interesting-30-seconds.html

Ohh well.. I did have fun for 30 secounds, when I went to a generated planet, so I guess the article is true.


https://www.thegamer.com/starfield-managed-to-make-space-boring/

[Mephitic]

It is only boring because you want it to be so. It is quite interesting for me and will be for a very long time.

[AoD_lexandro]

Sleeping is a loading screen.

[sarcastic_godot]

Originally posted by Fulguro Geek YouTube:

[...]Imagine how outdated your engine is Bethesda, they had a better game engine back in 1969!

Get a bit of reading, and then consider how outdated the Soyuz space capsule is. Still it brought dozens of astronauts to the ISS, and none of them complained about boredom.

[Silamon]

Originally posted by Liquid Inc:

and this bothers you why OP?

Wow there's loading screens in a game!!!! Such bad, much wow! /S

You trolls really can't think of anything new, can you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_lu152g5aM

There's a difference between having loading screens and having as many as starfield....

[Dagtag]

Originally posted by Silamon:

Originally posted by Liquid Inc:

and this bothers you why OP?

Wow there's loading screens in a game!!!! Such bad, much wow! /S

You trolls really can't think of anything new, can you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_lu152g5aM

There's a difference between having loading screens and having as many as starfield....

there is also a difference between a normal game and a game that requires an ssd like starfield.

there is also a huge difference in map size between normal games and starfield

[Silamon]

Originally posted by Dagtag:

Originally posted by Silamon:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_lu152g5aM

There's a difference between having loading screens and having as many as starfield....

there is also a difference between a normal game and a game that requires an ssd like starfield.

there is also a huge difference in map size between normal games and starfield

Starfield's huge map is just procedurally generated crap and you can't even travel on it, you have to use fast travel for everything.

Who plays games without an ssd in 2023? You can get one for like 20 bucks.

[Dagtag]

Originally posted by Silamon:

Originally posted by Dagtag:

there is also a difference between a normal game and a game that requires an ssd like starfield.

there is also a huge difference in map size between normal games and starfield

Starfield's huge map is just procedurally generated crap and you can't even travel on it, you have to use fast travel for everything.

procedural generation isn't an argument. a map is a map and the maps are bigger, period.

Who plays games without an ssd in 2023? You can get one for like 20 bucks.

everyone who doesn't have an ssd... I didn't buy a second ssd until this summer, for starfield