Thank God Bethesda didn't make Fallout New Vegas 2

[Wade]

After Starfield, can you imagine what that would look like? LOL

Millions of fans have been begging for Fallout New Vegas 2 for years, but now I'm so glad Bethesda didn't make it (even though the original game wasn't made by Bethesda, but Obsidian).

Hey Beth, please stick with your decision and don't make FNV2.

Thank you

[DANEDANGER]

*Yawns* Bait harder

[vonbleak]

Honestly i would rather them go back to a more traditional game like F3 or Skyrim - Thats what they do best... F76 and Starfield were experiments and them trying different things... They just need to go back to their roots and do what they are good at...

Bring on ES6 i say...

[Anticitizen 1]

They shouldn't make games full stop in my opinion after the abortion that is Shartfield.

[Wade]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

They just need to go back to their roots and do what they are good at...

JUST? LOL

The dead man ONLY needs to be revived and he will be alive again. Piece of cake...

[Ravnhood]

Well, they didn't make the first one either, so....

[mav001au]

Originally posted by Doc Mitchell:

After Starfield, can you imagine what that would look like? LOL

Millions of fans have been begging for Fallout New Vegas 2 for years, but now I'm so glad Bethesda didn't make it (even though the original game wasn't made by Bethesda, but Obsidian).

Hey Beth, please stick with your decision and don't make FNV2.

Thank you

1/10 can do better

[Anticitizen 1]

Originally posted by Blackbird DK:

Well, they didn't make the first one either, so....

That's why it was the best Fallout.

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by Doc Mitchell:

Originally posted by vonbleak:

They just need to go back to their roots and do what they are good at...

JUST? LOL

The dead man ONLY needs to be revived and he will be alive again. Piece of cake...

Yeah its not hard - Im not saying thats what they will do, but the blue print for success is right there for them to use...

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

Originally posted by Blackbird DK:

Well, they didn't make the first one either, so....

That's why it was the best Fallout.

Fallout was cool for sure, but Fallout 2 was much better than the first one - The timer killed it for me... I hate time restrictions...

And to be fair i loved both Fallout 3 and FNV... But they obviously look/play quite differently...

Fallout 4/F76... Hmm lets not go there haha...

[Anticitizen 1]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Originally posted by Anticitizen 1:

That's why it was the best Fallout.

Fallout was cool for sure, but Fallout 2 was much better than the first one - The timer killed it for me... I hate time restrictions...

And to be fair i loved both Fallout 3 and FNV... But they obviously look/play quite differently...

Fallout 4/F76... Hmm lets not go there haha...

FO3 wasn't bad but NV was better imo. FO4 was meh and I didn't even try 76 for obvious reasons.

[Wade]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Yeah its not hard - Im not saying thats what they will do, but the blue print for success is right there for them to use...

In THEORY, everything is possible. The only problem is the chance of probability…
For Bethesda and Todd to make quality and immersive games again after F76, Redfall and Starfield? ... like Fallout 3 or at least Fallout 4. Let me see... I think the chance is 0.43% or so. And I am not even joking.

[Silverlight]

Get obsidian to make starfield: New Vegas.

Same premise but instead of Las Vegas in apocalypse it's new las Vegas on a desert planet

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by Doc Mitchell:

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Yeah its not hard - Im not saying thats what they will do, but the blue print for success is right there for them to use...

In THEORY, everything is possible. The only problem is the chance of probability…
For Bethesda and Todd to make quality and immersive games again after F76, Redfall and Starfield? ... like Fallout 3 or at least Fallout 4. Let me see... I think the chance is 0.43% or so. And I am not even joking.

You know Todd had little to do with F76 and nothing to do with Redfall right...?

[Wade]

Originally posted by vonbleak:

Originally posted by Doc Mitchell:

In THEORY, everything is possible. The only problem is the chance of probability…
For Bethesda and Todd to make quality and immersive games again after F76, Redfall and Starfield? ... like Fallout 3 or at least Fallout 4. Let me see... I think the chance is 0.43% or so. And I am not even joking.

You know Todd had little to do with F76 and nothing to do with Redfall right...?

Hahaha... you know Todd has nothing to do with Starfield? He didn't program any line of code. He was just game director.

[vonbleak]

Originally posted by Doc Mitchell:

Originally posted by vonbleak:

You know Todd had little to do with F76 and nothing to do with Redfall right...?

Hahaha... you know Todd has nothing to do with Starfield? He didn't program any line of code. He was just game director.

Yeah lead creative director meaning it was his game - Just like Morrowind/Oblivion/Fallout 3 and Skyrim, F4... You know - the good games lol...

He was only a producer on F76 and literally had nothing to do with Redfall...

Starfield is not amazing but its no worse than F4...