Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Why? What was cool about it? Just curious.
...might've been too much for some, without an "irony!"-tag.
Everyone should play the hecking underrated hidden gem Witcherino three with Geraldo!
Or the GOTY Baldurs Gate 3, just not right now because the devs added a gamebreaking bug into the game LOL.
The real moon landing, there were things to do. From the web:
they did other things too (look at earth and around the sky, plant flag, take pictures, whatever), but that is enough for the differences to sink in:
within 5 min of landing on any of the rock moons, we have:
- scanned all 3-4 of the materials present, maybe mined a few pieces
- noted the lack of any plants and animals and special features to scan
- noted the lack of POI buildings
- played in low gravity for a min or two
- moved on to a more interesting environment.
because that is all there is to DO in this game.
even on a really good day, an extra 5 min and you have an extractor-outpost set up.
Am I disappointed to see a game, about the exploration of that empty space, is actually fairly empty? Not in the slightest.
Yeah the mission in the NASA launch pad pushed some of my buttons. That was awesome.
On the other hand, shortly before being through the game, visiting a moon or barren planet in the level 60+ outer parts can be boring. There's rarely really something to explore. From a realism standpoint that makes sense. It's not Disney Land everywhere. But from my player's perspective, the game world becomes smaller by that.
Bethesda should have spread the colonies and cities a little thinner and thus wider.
I think that the majority of people who have access to media produces the last 100 years have really been conditioned by that media to think of space as an exciting place always with some drama to be solved. From Buck Rogers, to Flash Gordon, to Star Wars, to Battlestar Galatica, to Star Trek to the Expanse there is always something going on. Most don't realize it is all tied into the people in the shows and their interaction with the world around them.
As to the OP post for some reason Bethesda has gone out of their way to reply to the negative views off this game more then I have seen them on any other game. The reply seems to be we designed it that way so you aren't playing the game correctly. Overall it isn't a good decision as it just compounds the effect of the review.