Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Its definitely not outdated, but you're playing with a card that is basically 5~10%~ within a 2080TI, the recommended card to play this game with (2080) for the base medium settings at 1080p. So you're looking at being able to reliably do 1080p on high with your card based upon their recommended specs.
The fact you're having so many problems with your card when at least 6 replies in the 4 pages here with your exact specs saying they're not having issues leads me to believe its something on your side. Have you benchmarked your PC and done comparisons to where you should be? Something doesn't sound right here.
There is nothing wrong with my hardware setup! I'm not going to pay for benchmarking software!
Witcher3 in 2015 has better graphics than Starfiefd.
I'd say an RTX 3080 is the absolute minimum right now to run newer games at max settings at 1440p. 3070ti should still be good enough for 1080p but any selfrespecting pc gamer plays at at least 1440p.
I play at 1080p and enjoy it very much thank you!
I can go 4K if I wanted, guess I don't repect myself ... lol...
I don't know why you people always leave out the most important information, namely at which resolution you're playing at. Playing Starfailed at 4k with an RTX 3070 it will run like a slide show, but at 1080p it should be more than enough to run it on high settings.
Imo you're a console gamer.
No I have an I7 13700K, 32gb, rtx 4070TI...
Been responding to all the DLSS threads telling people it won't make that much difference over FRS... and here we are with yet another complaint that DLSS didn't make a difference.
Of course it didn't, it only helps a small percentage of setups. If you don't have that limited setup it won't make much difference.
I don't really bother with 1440p, and only uses 1080p, so yeah, the 3070ti should be good enough. 9244 on Uniengine, which is to be expected of my hardware configuration.
Starfield has a much higher polygon count than Cyberpunk 2077 (hence the demanding performance) and yet manages to look worse!
That's not true for everyone. I only have a I7 11700kf and a RTX 3060ti OC. and the patch helped me go from Medium/High settings to Ultra/High settings at 1080p using DLSS/ DLSS Quality. The game plays just as smooth as before, but looks much better.
But I have it capped at 60 fps with Vsync on. The Patch certainly had a nice visual and performance boost for me. Not everyone needs 100+ fps to be happy.
OP. You should look to see if you have Motion blur set off and Resolution Scaling set to about 60% or lower if you are using Ultra settings. The DLSS Quality will upscale it to the native ( 1080p ) anyway and does not need that setting high to maintain steady frames.
I also have Dynamic Resolution turned off.