Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And this is an unexpected problem why?
If you wanted your PC cpu to not be fully engaged you would have purchased an i9 from say the LGA 1700 socket variety.
AMD is not known for its multitasking dominance, its a gaming CPU an a good one at that particular yours.
Where-as the 5600x is well an entry level CPU and one that does not sport a lot of CPU cores at that, PC still has to process all the other programs that may be running including windows.
Low Core PC wont have a lot of wiggle room to process other tasks and will be mostly engaged in the 80% or even higher range anyway, nothing to see here.
Go check out FrameChasers, TechDeals, or read about that stuff on Overclockers dot net.
Also heard about setting Starfield in Task Manager to Realtime priority could help but haven’t done it my self (so rumors).
Thanks, makes sense.
Thank you, I'll try this.
I didn't buy an i9, and I'm not looking to upgrade right now. I'm asking about the numbers from my current hardware. Thank you for the suggestion.
But OP is still bottlenecked more then me, I run a RTX 3070 on mine and GPU is always at 100% like it should be because I have more cores/threads, starfield is a good example where Core/Threads matters more then newer architecture
Gamefever's post above has it right