Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Those games are great and deserve success.
And Starfield has 10m players in 1 month.
You couldn't 'X is better than Y' before.. now you think a tag-team will do better?
Bless.
Ad Homs/Sneers(
I thought you guys are sooo keen on the phrase "trust the science."
Why are numbers so scary to you.
1. The fact it works on my laptop suggests it's performant, right?
2. Context: https://twitter.com/StarfieldGame/status/1704246689123492120
= https://www.vgchartz.com/article/458389/starfield-tops-6-million-players-biggest-bethesda-launch-of-all-time/
"Fastest to 10M in Bethesda history and will gross over 1B$ easily since people usually play these games for several plus yrs. Sold 2M preorder $100 editions prior to launch."
No other product in it's class.
Why does everybody keep saying that. RTS games are limited and long term support and overhauls are great to keep it alive.
Would't say it's garbage if you played the previous games you know what to expect basically. it's a 6/10 nothing more nothing less.