Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
This thread is about both Starfield and CP77. The gunplay is bad in both (and in Destiny and the Division) for the same reason, which is that they're aping Borderlands. The inherent jankiness of them all could be balanced out by just fiddling with damage numbers slightly. For example in Destiny multiplayer where they're consumed with making sure it plays as much like Halo as possible, they do this and you get a brief glimpse of a game that isn't about selling a raid and Whedonesque dialogue every fiscal quarter.
Games under Zenimax with better gunplay: nu-DOOM, nu-Wolfenstein.
Don't get mad. I am not judging you for being a thief and stealing the games. I'm just making an observation based on what you said.
I will get the dlc for CP at some point, and see if it really is better, but even at 1.5 CP still felt like a rushed product.
CDPR are still miles better at storytelling and world building than Bethesda.
EDIT: Dont bother quoting me. I am not subscribed.
Farewell. I will miss you even if the others won't. :'(