Starfield

Starfield

View Stats:
Fast Sep 12, 2023 @ 5:19am
2
Starfield (2023) Vs Crysis 3 (2013)
https://imgur.com/a/SUo4ZGF

so yes...it really is visually lacking...

BTW theres a few other games that look better than this within the 2012-2015 era but if you were took look around 2020 or below tons of games simply make starfield look 10 years old.
Last edited by Fast; Sep 12, 2023 @ 5:32am
< >
Showing 31-45 of 76 comments
rufus_mcgayhee Sep 14, 2023 @ 8:28pm 
Originally posted by Fast:
https://imgur.com/a/SUo4ZGF

so yes...it really is visually lacking...

BTW theres a few other games that look better than this within the 2012-2015 era but if you were took look around 2020 or below tons of games simply make starfield look 10 years old.
Crisis sucks tho
MrSoul Sep 14, 2023 @ 8:32pm 
Originally posted by AoD_lexandro:
Originally posted by Fast:

starfield doesnt even have aliens....haha

Yes it does. What do you think all those animals and plants on planets are? Cheetos?

It does not have living sentient aliens, is what you mean. So that means no space elves.
:( but I want an eldar waifu companion.

This game is literally unplayable.
rufus_mcgayhee Sep 14, 2023 @ 8:33pm 
Originally posted by Mr.Soul:
Originally posted by AoD_lexandro:

Yes it does. What do you think all those animals and plants on planets are? Cheetos?

It does not have living sentient aliens, is what you mean. So that means no space elves.
:( but I want an eldar waifu companion.

This game is literally unplayable.
step 1: get off steam forum

step 2: program waifu mod

step 3: share mod on steam forum

BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE IN THE WORLD
MrSoul Sep 14, 2023 @ 8:35pm 
Originally posted by rufus_mcgayhee:
Originally posted by Mr.Soul:
:( but I want an eldar waifu companion.

This game is literally unplayable.
step 1: get off steam forum

step 2: program waifu mod

step 3: share mod on steam forum

BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE IN THE WORLD
…*clenches fist* you’re right!
ArmoredSaint Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:02am 
Originally posted by Fear2288:
Originally posted by ArmoredSaint:


HAHAHAHAHAJAHA
Keep laughing. The numbers don’t lie.

Crysis sold barely 3 million copies, Crysis Warhead sold 1.5 million, Crysis 2 sold a bit less than 3 million, and Crysis 3 sold 154,000 copies.

And yes, that’s 154,000 copies across three different platforms.

Those are the numbers as of 2023.

The series - overall - was a flop.

They looked cool and had great graphics, but they had nothing going on beyond that.


It is completely absurd to compare game sales with such a difference in years. Nowadays, there are three times more gamers than before on all platforms, and you are comparing a game that has had such a high hype campaign that it has crashed to the ground.

Furthermore, man... If the success of something or saying that something is better than another based on popularity, god... It's the most absurd thing. Popular or commercial doesn't mean better.

Examples: The Forest, PUBG


Let's agree to disagree, and that's it. Objectively, Starfield is graphically outdated, and comparing graphics with the age difference is entirely valid.
peon Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:09am 
Yeah it is a poor comparison.

On a side note, no other game has had grass as beautiful as crysis 3, truely under rated game.

Your right op, the models look better than starfields. But not the animations.

Ill give it to bethesda on this one, their models are pretty low texture as well as being to rounded and bland. But the facial movements are very well done. (must be mocap).

It feels very much like your talking to a real person imo.

Right up there with la noire if you ask me....
Last edited by peon; Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:10am
Aramis Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:10am 
Originally posted by amogus87432:
Originally posted by potato:
crysis has one character, starfield has hundreds

yeah totally valid comparison

oh and crysis 3 sucked and was like 3 hours long

People will continue to talk about Crysis 3 until the year 2050, while Starfield will go out of fashion in a couple of weeks
No one talks about crapsis now bro
eMiKo Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:21am 
Originally posted by peon:
Yeah it is a poor comparison.

On a side note, no other game has had grass as beautiful as crysis 3, truely under rated game.

Your right op, the models look better than starfields. But not the animations.

Ill give it to bethesda on this one, their models are pretty low texture as well as being to rounded and bland. But the facial movements are very well done. (must be mocap).

It feels very much like your talking to a real person imo.

Right up there with la noire if you ask me....
Starfield is not mocap.
You can see by how weird the mouth protrudes when they talk. Its just as bad as Mass Effect Andromeda, afaik it was even the same studios behind it.
VoiD Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:29am 
Originally posted by peon:
Yeah it is a poor comparison.

On a side note, no other game has had grass as beautiful as crysis 3, truely under rated game.

Your right op, the models look better than starfields. But not the animations.

Ill give it to bethesda on this one, their models are pretty low texture as well as being to rounded and bland. But the facial movements are very well done. (must be mocap).

It feels very much like your talking to a real person imo.

Right up there with la noire if you ask me....
It really, really doesn't though.

It's specially bad after BG3, some people were saying Larian was being bold trying to release their game a month before Starfield, but in reality, it was starfield that got spoiled by BG3.

10 years ago these stiff-robot-like-soul-staring-NPC-Faces could have been tolerated but looking at them right after real living motion capture scenes and expressions for every little thing in BG3 makes this look like crap from 4 generations ago.

And when you realize how long it's been on development, and how they spent 4x more than BG3 to get this result makes it even worse.

Edit in case you haven't played it, here you go, it's hard to even compare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xZWW9sWVJo
vs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e2rnxmCyW4
Last edited by VoiD; Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:34am
dulany67 Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:42am 
Morrowind, Oblivion, and FO3 were all hailed for cutting edge graphics at release. Skyrim iterated on those graphics very well. Even FO76 was beautiful environmentally.

But Starfield is serviceable at best, and the characters are not good for 2023. My conclusion: it's because of its console nature.

On the brighter side, modders will release texture mods.
ArmoredSaint Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:43am 
Originally posted by Aramis:
Originally posted by amogus87432:

People will continue to talk about Crysis 3 until the year 2050, while Starfield will go out of fashion in a couple of weeks
No one talks about crapsis now bro
We're doing it now friend.
Kemalist(mdx³) Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:43am 
Crysis was an engine demo for pormotion, a bad one at that.
Cryengine games are eben more poorly optimised than morrowinds engine....
Lef Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:44am 
Originally posted by Fast:
https://imgur.com/a/SUo4ZGF

so yes...it really is visually lacking...

BTW theres a few other games that look better than this within the 2012-2015 era but if you were took look around 2020 or below tons of games simply make starfield look 10 years old.
thx for teeling us you don t know how games work
Lef Sep 15, 2023 @ 3:45am 
Originally posted by amogus87432:
Originally posted by potato:
crysis has one character, starfield has hundreds

yeah totally valid comparison

oh and crysis 3 sucked and was like 3 hours long

People will continue to talk about Crysis 3 until the year 2050, while Starfield will go out of fashion in a couple of weeks
its been year since i have hear of Crysis
< >
Showing 31-45 of 76 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 12, 2023 @ 5:19am
Posts: 76