Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Or is it just that you can't spend a single day without making a thread about your secret school crush? ;)
The game was not optimised sufficiently on PC.
What has his sexuality to do anything with anything you weirdo?
I haven't had issues with the game running, none of my friends have either. And none of us are rocking current-year parts. We've got a mix of AMD/intel/nvidia hardware too. This leads me to believe that there was a pretty heavy emphasis on optimization. The only issue we've had was two people who installed it on hard drives instead of SSDs, and their problems were resolved immediately upon fixing that.
Given I have a 980ti and a i7-6700K CPU and run the game perfectly fine on med-high settings at 1080p (despite the random crash), this is exactly right.
So it's not extremely bad. Jedi Survivor was way harder on my slightly older system.
And you changed your Steam name to his because that is your first time doing that?
Yeah now your are even lying about it, pretty obvious what is on your mind right now, you little HowardFan ;)
Ubisoft games on average play smoother, on lower end hardware whilst looking visually better then Starfield. Example Assassins Creed: Valhalla had better visuals and way better motion caption/facial animation. Seamless loading.