Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
My 4090 sits at 70-80. With? 130-144.
I love the game, but it's true that the optimization is bad. People with 4080s and 4090s should be sitting at 120 plus frames locked. Instead it can range and even go as low as sub 60 in some areas.
Not necessarily. Just because Todd says something doesn't mean it won't happen. He's propaganda. The actual people who work on the game, can see the feedback and will release one, if one is necessary. They just won't necessarily tell Todd.
I hope so! I have been seeing rumors for a few days that a patch is in the works but no release so far and I'm surprised they didn't release it on actual launch day. I was hoping for some Nvidia drivers that say they are for Starfield too but nothing there either, not that it would likely matter. Lol
Yeah 4000 series guys are lucky for that modder.. I wish I was as lucky.. I'm on a 3070 ti so can't use frame Gen. Still, it's sad that with a 400p series card, ppl have to rely on mods and frame Gen to make the game feel decent.
Do you realize how many years we had to plan for this game. He said 5 years ago it would be Next Gen. We set aside some of our money for a decent PC for this game, starting 4 years ago.
P.S. I am not saying the game doesn't need a little optimization but mostly it runs well considering.